Someone posted this in the thread about the Times article itself, but I'll copy what I had said there here, too.
Wow. Definitely classy, and handled very well. And *very* interesting. I'm definitely surprised that it was unplanned and wasn't set to be a coming-out article before it took place. I can't assume that it wasn't somewhere in his mind to do at some point, because he had been considering in some capacity, but I have no reason not to believe what he says about it being somewhere in his heart and happening for a reason.
He very eloquently clears up a lot: that he didn't know this is what it would be going in, what he wishes it had been... and that he knows he made some mistakes. In that sense, if you can believe him at all, I think you can no longer contest that he has no regard for the people impacted. He acted with his heart more than his head, and I can't place much fault with someone who recognizes that and handles it with class.
My friend and I got a chance to speak with him after a performance this week. I don't want to go into what was said on the boards, but I'll repeat this much of what I've said to a number of people privately since then. I think he's a good egg.
Bravo to you, Raúl.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 12/1/06 at 02:35 AM