Alan Cumming to tie the knot! — Page 3

Wow, etoile. For someone who posts nothing but snarky and chastising posts, it's ironic that you're now telling me that you are the one of the two of us who posts here for "amusement."

The joke about the weekend was just that - a joke. Making light of a situation that's a pain in the ass, travel-wise, and funny in the fact that I haven't been to a wedding in years, and now here are two, hundreds of miles away from each other, within two days time. Come on, that's funny! And if I didn't want to go to them, I wouldn't. I'm honored to be a part of both - extremely happy for all involved.

As far as resentment, I don't resent anyone for what career or life they have. I am one who believes that we are where we are because that's where life has taken us - it's the decisions I've made that put me where I am today. No one else's. That attitude makes resentment impossible, and makes my life my own responsibility.

The only thing I "resent" about the Alan Cumming nuptials is that he wasn't allowed to be wed in the country he's chosen to adopt - sadly, he had to go back to the country our forefathers left in order to found a "free" nation.

---

Awwwwwww. Don't they look HAPPY!

---

That's supposed to be the photo of a "happy couple"???

They both look drunk.

---

People drink at weddings. Sheesh.

---

I can be snarky and chastising in my post. I don't suffer fools. I do call out people on their sh*t. Perhaps that's why our post have crossed.

So, since you've failed yet again to answer and have only attempted to derail and deflect, I'll ask again. What did you mean by insultingly calling Alan Cumming a sleazy little hobag?

Or did I see you answer indirectly and about yourself in another post of yours, "Nutcases around here today. Desperate to show others in a bad light, I guess they think that makes them look better?"

So is that it? Is that why you insult others? Is that why do you feel the need to snipe at so many performers? Why such harsh and unwarranted criticisms of these very same people you hope so desperately to work among some day. Have you not a clue how many bridges you have burned with your insults? Who would hire you? Who would want to work with you? Who would want see what you post about them next? Your website was listed in the past. You're still in who's who. They'd know who to blacklist. You, with all your industry insiderness, certainly knows how small a world it is. So keep tapping away there, Peggy Sawyer, just don't expect to see those footlights anytime soon.

---

Plenty of mirrors but still no reply why you insulted Alan Cumming. The question is not going to go away. You insulted the wrong performer this time around.

---

Funny thing is, Alan would probably be pleased to hear he's been called a sleazy little hobag or whatever.

I never claimed to be seldom here. I just seldom post. Ever try it?

You called the man, "...that sleazy little hobag." You can once again try to spin, backpedal, and deflect but that's an insult no matter how you now want to try and rationalize it away. When do insults at a gay man become germane to the same sex marriage issue? Only in Rath's world. It is comforting to know that you say it was all to poke fun at an issue that is so very vital and near & dear to so many here.

---

Something told me not to open this thread.

Maybe it was a joke. Maybe it's how Rath feels about Cumming. Either way, she doesn't owe you or anyone else an explanation.

And, for the record, I know plenty of people who refer to her by her real name off of the board.

---

What's so wrong about being a ho-bag?!?

(by the way, there is a hyphen.)

---

Not a problem.

I'm glad I can be of some use around here! =D

---

Updated On: 1/9/07 at 12:55 PM

*desperately clines*

---

Something told me not to open this thread.

Was it the fact that Rath was posting on it?

---