"No thanks. I've moved on. Perhaps you should too."
Uh-
huh.
Speaking of looking back, I had not seen Jose's gushing love-letter-to-BBM thread until it was just resurrected... I wish people like Luscious could convey WHAT it was that made them not only overlook the flaws in the film but, in fact, call the flaws the opposite of what they are.
Luscious wrote, "Just got back from seeing BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN and words cannot do it justice. It's a heartbreakingly beautiful film that works on every possible level."
Every possible level? Maybe as an allegory but certainly not on the level of realism.
"Story wise, seemingly simple, yet full of complexities and nuances. Everything about it is authentic, and every performance rings absolutely true."
Oh, let me just start with the most major of the inauthenticities: NO straight men, NONE OF THEM, have sex the way those two do for the first time. ESPECIALLY after drinking. None. And I don't care if its faithful to the short story, that's Prioux's fantasy. Which is fine. But it's inauthentic. Here's another, that's not what bullriders' bodies looked like in the early-'60s. Believe me, I know the subject.
"But I'll go out on a limb and predict that BROKEBACK will win this year's Oscar for Best Picture. I cannot imagine a better or more deserving film."
Seriously? Literally? You cannot imagine a better film? You must have a fairly limited imagination. I've seen better films, lots of them. So it's not only impossible to imagine them, it's possible to measure the failures of BBM against them.
And what makes a movie like Brokeback "deserving" over another anyway? If it wins, and you cry with pride, will it be a triumph of merit or marketing?
"His performance ranks up there with the likes of Brando at his peak."
Each is entitled to his opinion. But that's simply a wrong one.
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none