qolbinau said: "She could say that maybe voters didn't want someone representing the working class who received obscene amounts of money to tell an investment banking firm you should have a public and private position.
She could say that maybe voters didn't want someone who voted for the Iraq war, various trade policies, bankruptcy bill etc.
She could say that maybe voters didn't want someone who was willing to carry on the business as usual policies around taxes, healthcare etc. and only adjust the minimum wage marginally.
She could say that maybe voters didn't want someone who has flip flopped on almost every major issue such as gay marriage, trade policies, bankruptcy bill etc.
But no. It's because of the Russians and her gender. I mean, I'm sure it is. But she was up against the worst political candidate in history. There is a lot more than just gender going on that would cause defeat here (including the awful system given she did actually get more votes than him. Ridiculous.)."
Everything you just said about her is the current President times 1000. "Represents the working class?" Give me a break. "Taxes, health care, and minimum wage?" Light years apart. "Flip flop?" Look at the asshat in the Oval Office.
She lost because of misinformation, character assassination, and pure stupidity on the part of the voters. If she were a man, none of this would have mattered. You know how I know that? Because look who is in the White House.
"I shall stay until the wind changes."
Updated On: 6/5/17 at 10:29 AM