Edwards Sex Cost Hillary the Nomination- Page 2

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 5:29pm

Edward's is a freaking jerk for wasting campaign money knowing full well this was brewing. Sometimes I swear this party has it in for itself.


Next up McCain has Lieberman on his short list... LOL I love that one was a democratic VP nominee and the other almost was. Of course both are neo-con hacks now.

[romantico]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 5:32pm

I see. And what are you basing your theory on? I mean, if your "theory" is accurate, wouldn't it have benefited Hillary more to expose this during the primaries? Edwards won Iowa. Why not take him out earlier so it was just Obama and Hillary? She could have easily won more states this way. I think your prejudice towards Hillary is interfering with your rational sound reasoning.

Of course, I would never dream of asking you to back any of this up just like I would never dream of saying something like Bush had prior knowledge to 911. I can't stand Bush, but despite my hatred towards the man there are some things I just know he is not guilty of that people have accused him of.

[Gothampc]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 5:38pm

"wouldn't it have benefited Hillary more to expose this during the primaries?"

No! Hillary was already seen as a cold beyotch. She couldn't release the story when Elizabeth had cancer.

March 22, 2007 - John Edwards press conference re wife has cancer

January 3, 2008 Iowa caucus where Edwards comes in second, but Hillary wins more delegates.

[YouWantitWhen????]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 5:42pm

Goth, if Hillary was half as powerful as you describe, she would be the nominee.

The NE reported this in November, and the MSM did not pick it up. The LA Times held the story as well.

If anything, it hurts McCain, because now people are talking again about his infidelity.

If anything, from the reports, it appears that Clinton pulled back from her campaign's recommendations on aggressive/campaigning.

[Gothampc]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 5:46pm

"Goth, if Hillary was half as powerful as you describe, she would be the nominee."

It ain't over until it's over. I don't put anything past the Clinton Machine.

[romantico]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 5:56pm

Goth, you keep contradicting yourself.

Yeah, we know cold bitch,yada, yada,yada.

She is also a smart lady. She would not have made the mistakes you are by speculating.So, keep spinning and BSing. I am sure someone else may buy it, but I and I am guessing others here will not.

Hillary won't be the nominee Goth. Hell, she won't even be VP. You Hillary haters mocked her when she mention right wing conspiracy. Look at you people now. LOL!

[PalJoey]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 6:08pm

There is a rumor going around today that David Axelrod told John Edwards to endorse Obama or the campaign would release the information about his affair.

[romantico]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 6:16pm

If Obama had prior knowledge why would he want Edwards endorsement? Everyone had to know this story was going to eventually break.

Another thing that disturbs me now that I look back at it is Elizabeth Edwards announced her cancer about 2 days after the election in 2004. At the time, she said she had just found out about it. I now wonder if she was diagnosed in the spring/summer of 2004.

Like Bush and Cheney, I am now having to question EVERYTHING about Edwards.

[Roninjoey]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 9:11pm

Would Hillary have won Iowa? The polls don't necessarily support this notion. So really it's all just speculation.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2008/08/iowa_without_edwards.html


I just think it's lame that Edwards would waste all of our time and money when this story has been floating around waiting to break since 2006. Just IMAGINE if he were the nominee.

[Unknown User]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 10:47pm

Why do people keep saying that? Didn't we stand by Bill Clinton? I don't understand what the difference is. Personal life doesn't matter- how many times did we say that?

[madbrian]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 10:48pm

Fox got a real gem in Wolfson, no? Between him and Lanny Davis, they got the dregs of the Clinton camp. Still, they did raise the average IQ over there.

[PalJoey]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 10:51pm

Is it just me or does anyone else keep reading this thread title as "Excessive Sex Cost Hillary the Nomination"?

Updated On: 8/11/08 at 10:51 PM

[Namaste]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 11:29pm

It's just you.

[PalJoey]

Posted: 8/11/08 at 11:34pm

Well, now maybe you won't be able to look at that thread title and NOT see it.

[WindyCityActor]

Posted: 8/12/08 at 10:42am

How about Whitehouse blowjobs cost Al Gore presidency?

[PalJoey]

Posted: 8/12/08 at 10:51am

AMY Whitehouse?!?

[Gothampc]

Posted: 8/12/08 at 10:55am

"Personal life doesn't matter- how many times did we say that?"

Even if campaign money was spent on his fancy woman?