Ellen's Emotional Plea — Page 4
Posted: 10/16/07 at 6:58pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 7:01pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 7:07pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 7:12pm
I wouldn't be surprised if they wouldn't let them apply, because they "illegally" possessed the dog without their permission.
Wanting life but never knowing how
Posted: 10/16/07 at 7:16pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 8:05pm
I've been with my husband 9 years, but I still can't...
nuff said.
Put the dog's where they are happy. THEY know where they want to be.
Posted: 10/16/07 at 8:08pm
rescues tell you all the rules up front before they will even let you apply.
& then it is all repeated on the application form, with check boxes to show that the potential adopter understands. it is an important part of the application process & is NOT a "fine print" item.
they dont want to bother researching you unless they know YOU ARE SERIOUS; that is why they they tell potential adopters all this information UP FRONT...if a potential adoptee gets discouraged & gives up, then their commitment was not that strong to begin with.
Posted: 10/16/07 at 8:54pm
Click on my profile and watch Chita Rivera "Put On A Happy Face"
Posted: 10/16/07 at 8:59pm
Why can't that family just go to the rescue mission and adopt it?
Updated On: 10/16/07 at 08:59 PM
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:01pm
Chita, the dog is most likely with a foster family. There are people who act as halfway houses for dogs going between a rescue and their home. To let the family involved here foster it while they investigate it would still be going against what the rescues are about.
And what norn said.
PS Can someone help poor nedioca? He can't read three and a half whole pages! He can't read even one.
Updated On: 10/16/07 at 09:01 PM
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:02pm
that's BS..time after time I have people tell me they are strung along by these agencies only to be denied weeks or months later, without explanation, or give up in frustration of dealing with the 10th home visit, having to provide at least half a dozen personal references and undergoing b/g checks that would make the feds head spin.
The bottom line is that the animal doesn't get adopted and spends more time in a cage or a foster home, or several foster homes, or ends up back at the shelter when these rescue organizations get in over their heads and end up not being able to care for all of the animals they take in.
It's easier to adopt a child than it is a dog or cat from some of these people.
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:06pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:09pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:14pm
Click on my profile and watch Chita Rivera "Put On A Happy Face"
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:17pm
Click on my profile and watch Chita Rivera "Put On A Happy Face"
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:29pm
They aren't lessening the chances. The dog will get adopted.
I don't understand why people try to keep making rescues the bad guys (when there isn't a bad guy here, except maybe Ellen, but for ungraciously doing this on television, not for not realizing she violated her agreement with the rescue people). I would love to hear more about the one cooperross dealt with. They seem to have done everything but rape her grandmother.
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:42pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:44pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:49pm
More to the point, why didn't that mother or father follow the agency to then apply for ownership?
If it meant that much to me, I would have
Cooperross, you wrote
"It's easier to adopt a child than it is a dog or cat from some of these people."
you really need to know what you are talking about before you spew this crap. My cousin just adopted a child, and a co-worker, and what they had to go through, and the time it took was ridiculous.......your above statement is truly ridiculous
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:55pm
we'll just rely on everyone's good intentions.
Posted: 10/16/07 at 9:55pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 10:27pm
It's not a credit card company. Animal placement is essentially a charity undertaking. Good intentions are the entire point. These rules and regulations are in place for the wellbeing of the animals, and should be made flexible when it is proven that the animal's wellbeing is still being preserved.
I don't fault them too harshly for adhering to their rules, but it's in their own best interest to follow up on the family the dog was with to see if they're a proper caretaker. If the family passes their inspections then it's in the dog's best interest too, and that's what should be most important to the company.
Posted: 10/16/07 at 10:30pm
Posted: 10/16/07 at 10:35pm
"Mutts and Moms owners Marina Batkis and Vanessa Chekroun were in possession of the dog and will not be giving it back, attorney Keith A. Fink told The Associated Press...
"She doesn't think this is the type of family that should have the dog. She is adamant that she is not going to be bullied around by the Ellen DeGenereses of the world ... They are using their power, position and wealth to try to get what it is they want...
"DeGeneres had said her hairdresser's daughters, ages 11 and 12, had bonded with Iggy and were heartbroken when the dog was taken away.
"Fink said Moms and Mutts has a rule that families with children under 14 are not allowed to adopt small dogs."
Ellen broke the rules. The kids are heartbroken. The pet store is being picketed. The dog goes back to foster care. A real win-win if I ever saw one.
BroadwayWorld TV