Posted: 4/25/17 at 4:38pm
I enjoyed it more than I thought I would, but I still had mixed feelings. The "Feud" idea was an interesting angle, though I agree with carnzee that the series was so wildly unbalanced, focusing mostly on Crawford, that it was hardly a "feud". As much as I can't stand Sarandon as a person, it's nearly impossible to deny her talent. Personally, I just can't get on board with being a Crawford sympathizer which made the final episode eye-rollingly schmaltzy for me, piling on heaps of theoretical sentimentality that not only didn't seem to ring true, but by that point, I frankly didn't care. All that manufactured pity almost entirely undercut the rest of the series. Lange acted as hard as she could, but was she more believable as Crawford than Sarandon as Davis? I didn't think so. She just happened to be given the pivotal role. The could have just called it All About Joan. Hoffman was okay, but I wouldn't call it a "subtle" performance. It was just intentionally wooden. She had to sport one expression and deliver every line as straight deadpan. And she did exactly that. I don't think there was anything revelatory or even very interesting happening there. Judy Davis, on the other hand, was perfection and I even thought Catherine Zeta Jones really captured the essence of de Havilland. But I was a bit confused by the inclusion of Joan Blondell. She was the only one I don't recall having any interaction with Joan, so her interviews didn't provide much of a reference point other than being "one of the girls" so to speak. She was hired to star in Strait-Jacket and then turned it down, but I don't remember if that was even mention in the series. I kept waiting for her relevance to the plot of the series, but it never arrived that I can recall.