The real question is, was it consensual?
In the documentary film, HORSE, the horse involved was on top. Therefore, in my opinion, it wasn't animal abuse. As for the animal lover involved, well...he's dead from a perforated colon, but I don't think he should be held up to ridicule or condemned for his proclivities.
The letter about the man and his dog states that the couple agreed that they had both witnessed the man "having sex" with his dog. But, in this case, what exactly does "having sex" mean? The advice columnist assumes that the man was engaged in the act of intercourse with the pooch. But perhaps the hound was felating his master. If so, big difference, IMHO.
Updated On: 7/20/14 at 01:46 PM