#76
Posted: 4/6/05 at 1:18pm
"His private messages at times are lucid and 100% correct regarding their spelling structure."
I've never seen a message from him that wasn't lucid. I've also never received a PM that was spelled correctly (and I've received numerous PMs from Liam), but he has asked for my assistance in spelling before (and probably others as well including family members and other board members). Either way, it does not prove in any way that he is or is not the person he claims. If he is an older person masquerading as a challenged youth, then it seems his actual posts would be much more controversial in content. Other than his spelling, there is nothing about his posts that would draw anyone's attention otherwise. That theory simply makes no sense other than to give people yet another subject to ridicule.
I do find it quite funny that rather than accept verification of Liam's identity from people who know him (people know me, but for some reason no one ever questions that), they would rather insist that they somehow know more about someone they have never met.
As far as I'm concerned, there is more evidence that proves Liam is who he says he is than not. All the rest is flimsy circumstantial evidence that could easily be explained, yet has been verified by no one. I guess it's just more fun to demonize someone rather than accept them.
Sueleen - It doesn't bother me. Many of Liam's most ardent accusors have been pretty perverted as well.
I've never seen a message from him that wasn't lucid. I've also never received a PM that was spelled correctly (and I've received numerous PMs from Liam), but he has asked for my assistance in spelling before (and probably others as well including family members and other board members). Either way, it does not prove in any way that he is or is not the person he claims. If he is an older person masquerading as a challenged youth, then it seems his actual posts would be much more controversial in content. Other than his spelling, there is nothing about his posts that would draw anyone's attention otherwise. That theory simply makes no sense other than to give people yet another subject to ridicule.
I do find it quite funny that rather than accept verification of Liam's identity from people who know him (people know me, but for some reason no one ever questions that), they would rather insist that they somehow know more about someone they have never met.
As far as I'm concerned, there is more evidence that proves Liam is who he says he is than not. All the rest is flimsy circumstantial evidence that could easily be explained, yet has been verified by no one. I guess it's just more fun to demonize someone rather than accept them.
Sueleen - It doesn't bother me. Many of Liam's most ardent accusors have been pretty perverted as well.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian