Agreed. On this of all days, it's out of BEING THERE to imagine even a half-serious discussion about the content of an SNL sketch.
I am fascinated by the use of language in this campaign, however, particularly since this obscure mediocrity was shoved into view. Suddenly, we hear an old fashioned term seldom employed in politics "disrespectful." As if respect was ever a component of election behavior. Mrs. Palin is owed our "respect" and even -- more shocking, still -- our "deference."
She -- a total unknown -- has been placed before the American public as a ready-made, fully-formed icon of feminism, complete with image-enhancing mythology and heart-tugging backstory. Even more remarkable, the paper-thin result is discussed as if handed down from the mount. Nothing in the hastily assembled "narrative" can be questioned; it's simply true. Nothing in her character, decision making skills, wisdom, or experience can be questioned, or the questioner reveals heretofore subconscious "sexism" or at the very least that peculiar "disrespect" (Attn: 3rd grade teachers teach a still viable proverb: respect is earned, not assumed.) It's the most preposterous show and tell in the history of American politics, and the only consolation is the rapidly growing body of evidence to tear it apart until it's not worth the 3 X 5 cards it was created on late one desperate Thursday night.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling