Miley's 9-year-old sister launching a lingerie line for kids

[romantico]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 9:36pm

How can Disney be associated with parents like Billy Ray Cyrus? Oh, and is that a stripper pole I see those children around?

http://celebrities.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?blogentryid=585857&showcomments=true&rss=yes

Updated On: 2/3/10 at 09:36 PM

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 9:43pm

[StockardFan]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 9:47pm

What the........???

[Jane2]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 9:51pm

And she looks a little like a witch to me. Makeup doesn't become you, NOAH?

[Eris0303]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 9:53pm

Didn't Miley take Madonna and Angelina to task over parading their kids in front of the cameras?

[Phyllis Rogers Stone]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 9:57pm

Are you suggesting Noah is really Miley's child (which would be totally awesome)?

I think you guys are all mean. This young girls are showing ingenuity and entrepreneurship. They are what makes America great. You are all just jealous and WISH you were a ten year old hoochie!

[Eris0303]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:00pm

Are you suggesting Noah is really Miley's child (which would be totally awesome)?

Haha, not in the least

[StockardFan]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:02pm

LMFAO!

[strummergirl]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:12pm

I should not be surprised as this family totally freaks me out.


People were all up in arms for the covered but topless photo in Vanity Fair, and considering she was 15 I can understand why, but the photo above freak me and my mother out far more.

[clever name]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:25pm

This can't be real!

[BwayTday]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:27pm

Classy.

[spiderdj82]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:32pm

She is one ugly kid. Sorry!

[Revolutionary]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:33pm

Is anyone really surprised? Really? Honestly?

[romantico]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:49pm

If she's good she will get plastic surgery for her 10th Birthday.Paging Gloria Alred! When is someone gonna step up to the plate and have the parents questioned? She looks like a burn out at nine years old. If we zoom in I swear we can see crows feet and worry lines. So sad.

Updated On: 2/3/10 at 10:49 PM

[SweetQintheLights]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:51pm

She really isn't an attractive kid to begin with.

In the last picture Revolutionary posted, she looks like a devil. For real.

[StockardFan]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 10:58pm

Poor kid.

[SueleenGay]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 11:01pm

At last Rumor Willis loses the title of Hollywood's Ugliest Kid!

[Phyllis Rogers Stone]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 11:13pm

Ouch. It's Rumer. RUMER!

[TheatreFan4]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 11:25pm

WTF?

I'm just going to say it because it's true, she is a big skank in the making.

[James885]

Posted: 2/3/10 at 11:25pm

Well all the pedophiles of the country will certainly be happy watching all those little girls flaunt their not-yet-developed bodies all over the place.

Seriously, why would a prepubescent little girl need lingerie?

[Craww]

Posted: 2/4/10 at 12:04am

UR ALL JUS JELLUS! Cuz all your elligible mens are hittin her up instead.

Noah, don't let all these trash talkers get you down gurrrrl.

JUST SMILE

[Phyllis Rogers Stone]

Posted: 2/4/10 at 12:11am

I know I'm going to hell for it, but god, this thread is making me laugh.

[Eris0303]

Posted: 2/4/10 at 12:19am

Seriously, why would a prepubescent little girl need lingerie?

Because that's the age where they start to really feel like they WANT to grow up. They're not kids but they're not teenagers either. So they want stuff the older girls have. Not all of them are like that but a good many of them are. So I imagine that's the reasoning behind this line.

And I'm not against a line of lingerie in theory but I'd have to see how it is executed. If we're just talking some pretty panties and training bras then it's okay. If we're going full out merry widows then I have an issue.

[Phyllis Rogers Stone]

Posted: 2/4/10 at 12:21am

I think that you actually make a good point, Eris, in a thread where I didn't think that was possible.

However, I think the most ick part is the calling it of lingerie. To ME, that's what ratchets up the sexualization.

[Marquise]

Posted: 2/4/10 at 12:40am

Calling it lingerie is what's questionable here. I can see where there could be a strong market for stylish pre-teen undergarments as long as it is marketed tastefully and that the line not include adult items such as fishnets and garters.