I'd like to add a voice in favor of using force against Syria. I agree that President Obama has not handled this adeptly, because I don't think Congress will approve using force. Then, he's in an even worse position.
I favored going into Afghanistan and STRONGLY opposed going into Iraq the second time. I did, however, approve of Desert Shield/Desert Storm. I favored going into Bosnia and wished that we had done something in Rwanda.
I think that the reason I part ways with most other liberals on the question of Syria is that I believe that "Never Again" must mean something. My parents escaped the Holocaust, and I lost relatives because the world did nothing. I don't see how we could have gone into Syria before, with the opposition potentially being as anti-Western as Assad. The last time we tried arming the "enemy of my enemy," thinking he must be a friend, we helped bin Laden. Now, however, we MUST make a move. I favor taking that bast**d out because we will save lives in the long run by doing so.
My worry if we do launch more than a few limited strikes is what will happen to Israel. I'll never forget Desert Storm -- Saddam Hussein swallows Kuwait, we go after Iraq, with the help of other Arab countries, and Iraq goes after Israel. We Jews have always told acerbic jokes about how middle Eastern dictators agree on only one thing: Whatever bad thing happens, it must be Israel's fault.
You alone can make my song take flight.