My my those royals really can't keep their clothes on can they?

She was sunbathing on private property. It's not like they have to wear magical underwear all the time.

How did she catch him?

They don't call it a snatch for nothing.

---

Who cares if grownups take off their clothes in private? The only ones who should be ashamed as far as I'm concerned are the ones who took the pictures, the ones who printed them, and the ones who ogle them.

Umm the patrons of childrens charities are others who should, which she happens to be by the way. One of those which is the UK version of the boy scouts, how do you expect them to explain this to poor little kiddies hmm. Or people representing their country aboard and at home, this makes them look very trashy. They certainly can't send her to the middle east as future queen now, and quite a few other countries won't exactly be thrilled. But here in the US since we don't fully grasp the concept, or understand all that being royal entails we treat them like celebrities which is really not what they are, they're international humanitarians and philanthropists.

Not that there is anything wrong with taking your clothes off in the privacy inside your home. But outside it is another, and most certainly not a good idea and if you are in there position anyone at court who doesn't like you and can learn about these kinds of plans will inform the paps about where you are and it will not end well for you.

Updated On: 9/15/12 at 09:48 PM

I'm not saying it's wrong for her to not wear anything in the privacy of her home but the minute she steps outside of that house she is in public, yes even a balcony. People can see her and when she represents her country it's pretty damn shameful. Private, not really the area is a working farm, with a villa the owners lease to wealthy vacationers so really even could have walked past and seen her.

Oh and when your a role model for children you certainly shouldn't be doing something like this when there is a possiblity you can be caught. As Sarah Ferguson said "I told my daughters the minute they stepped out of the house they had to be ready to smile, be friendly, and talk to people because they are in public and no one wants to see a grumpy princess. If they weren't in a good mood or weren't ready to do that they did not need to go out."

Also loving how you are all ignoring that she and wills claimed they were off doing their 'jobs' and instead went holidaying on public funds. She is not Di people, she's a very very very bad impersonation.

Updated On: 9/15/12 at 10:02 PM

Nonsense, and offensive nonsense to boot. There is nothing shameful about sunbathing and swimming in the nude.

I guess we should take heart that you think it's ok to take our clothes off in the privacy of our own homes, though. I hate showering while wearing cut-offs.

eta: "Also loving how you are all ignoring that she and wills claimed they were off doing their 'jobs' and instead went holidaying on public funds."

How do you know they weren't preparing for their work at this estate, and the photographs were taken during a well-deserved break in the action?

Or do you think it should be nose to the grindstone non-stop?

Updated On: 9/15/12 at 10:09 PM

Not sure citing Fergie is the best example since she too got embroiled in a topless scandal (also in a presumably private moment vacationing). Also the statement of being about her daughters not stepping out and looking embarrassing, umm....



And I really don't get the last comment about being a bad Princess Di impression. Seems like a nice woman and I doubt anybody is consciously trying to follow a trajectory of also a nice woman who also had many, many problems.

I guess it could be difficult to explain to children why someone would try to take pictures of people without their permission, and why other people would want to look at those pictures knowing they were taken under those circumstances.

I hope the British public is outraged by this unacceptable invasion of privacy.

I hope the Queen Mum is not next

---

Royal Gifs!