Obama was "For It" before he was "Against It"
#25Count A Believes His Own Version of Facts!
Posted: 8/16/10 at 6:33pmDamn! Coont A is really getting his a$$ handed to him today! LOL!
#26Obama was "For It" before he was "Against It"
Posted: 8/16/10 at 8:07pm
If you know the clever turn of the phrase, then you know how guilty poor Obama is.
I'm glad that is settled.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#27insert right-wing screed here
Posted: 8/16/10 at 9:00pmSo you admit he never said he was against the mosque? You admit you are lying?
#29Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/16/10 at 9:23pmIn the truest sense of the phrase, Obama was for it before he was against it. That's what I have been saying all along
#30Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/16/10 at 9:42pm
President Obama’s statements regarding the proposed Ground Zero mosque are the latest in a series of indicators that we are at a very peculiar pass: We have a president who doesn’t get America. For the first time in history we have a president whose default setting is in opposition to the general sensibilities of the American people. His behavior too frequently suggests that he’s playing a cosmic joke on Americans’ essential decency, considered patriotism, and belief in American exceptionalism.
Obama Vs. America
#31Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/16/10 at 9:44pm
This is profound writing people. Open your minds and behold the truth!
ou don’t need to have been a lecturer in constitutional law like Obama to know that the mosque’s backers have a right to build at Ground Zero. Polls show that Americans overwhelmingly acknowledge that right. But unlike the president, when his fellow Americans think of the construction of a mosque on Ground Zero, their view doesn’t begin and end with the First Amendment and local zoning ordinances. Rather, their view is of images that the mainstream media has done their best to airbrush out of our collective consciousness: Americans leaping out of windows and plunging — seemingly interminably — to their deaths to avoid incineration; first responders pulling charred remains from the smoking rubble of the collapsed towers; New Yorkers searching frantically for evidence that loved ones escaped the horror. That Obama, as the leader of the nation, fails to recognize that the situation calls for more than a sophomoric analysis that could be rendered by any first-year law student is disquieting.
As Dorothy Rabinowitz has noted, Obama’s alienation from the citizenry is just beginning to be more broadly revealed, but has been on display since the 2008 campaign.The media either failed to report it or chastised anyone who dared notice. When some remarked about Obama’s refusal to do something as simple as wear a flag lapel pin, they were pronounced unsophisticated and jingoistic. Obama’s casual stance during the playing of the “Star Spangled Banner” was declared a triviality. When Reverend Wright was caught shouting ” G–damn America!” those who wondered whether Obama’s 20 years in Wright’s pews might suggest ideological concurrence were dismissed as alarmist. When some expressed concern that Obama might agree with his wife that America is a “downright mean country” and that perhaps he, too, for the first time in his adult life, was proud of his country, they were told to grow up.
#33Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/16/10 at 9:58pm
The battle raging over the Ground Zero mosque is bringing new attention to another, less publicized controversy involving a house of worship in Lower Manhattan.
St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, which once sat right across the street from the World Trade Center, was crushed under the weight of the collapse of Tower Two on September 11, 2001. St. Nicholas was the only church to be lost in the attacks, and nine years later, while City of New York officials are busy removing every impediment to the building of the Cordoba mosque two blocks from the site, St. Nicholas’ future remains unclear.
The last bit of hopeful news for St. Nicholas came two years ago, in July 2008, when church officials and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey announced a deal which would have allowed the church to be rebuilt about two blocks from its original location.
We Liberals Have To Fight Discrimintation
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#34Introduing, Miss Emily Litella
Posted: 8/17/10 at 5:15am
So you regurgitate several hundred words more but still can't produce a single instance when President Obama said he was againt the mosque. Aren't you embarrassed? You started a thread to rail about something that never happened? You've been given several chances to back up your charge and you can't. Are you ashamed or are you so stupid you are incapable of realizing how embarrassing this is for you?
You're pushing 50, surely you remember the old Emily Litella sketches on Saturday Night Live where she'd get all wound up about the "Deaf Penalty," "Violins on television" or "saving Soviet Jewelry" and then when it's pointed out to her that she has completely misunderstood the issue, she'd smile and say "Oh, that's very different then....never mind."
That's where you are now. You've posted complete and utter lies about Michelle Obama's vacation, about president Obama's statements on the mosque, about your own history and beliefs and been called out repeatedly for it, Emily. Aren't you embarrassed?
#35Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/17/10 at 8:05am
You are choosing to ignore the meaning of the expression, "He was for it before he was against it."
Bless your heart. I know tone-deafness is a curse, I'm sorry.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#36Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/17/10 at 10:34am
The meaning would be that at one time he said one thing, at another time he said the opposite I GET THAT. What you apparently don't understand, Miss Litella, is that saying it doesn't make it so. You have been challenged to show me when he was "Against it." and you can't. It is now time to say "Oh, that's very different then. Never mind."
Updated On: 8/17/10 at 10:34 AM
#37Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/17/10 at 10:49am
Other places of worship two blocks from Ground Zero
#38I So Smart, I can Count to A!
Posted: 8/17/10 at 10:51am
Watch and learn!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dXFo0UUACM
#39Obama was for it before he was against it
Posted: 8/17/10 at 8:57pm
I do love this thread.
It is terribly interesting to see people scramble to defend the indefensible.
#42Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:21pm
I know you are trying to have this thread deleted. That's a shame. We must speak truth to power.
Obama was for it before he was against it.
#43The Count is DESPERATE......and is a LIAR!
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:26pmCoont A, you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on your a$$!Facts and honesty are like Kryptonite to your kind.You've been caught in so many lies here by EVERYONE the fact that you think people are listening and taking you serious is hilarious,just like the GOP's chances in 2012.You are a desperate troll and nothing more.
#44Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:30pm
You appear to be a caricature of a blind follower.
We will speak truth to power and Obama was for it before he was against it.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#45The Count is Emily Litella
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:32pm
Deleted? I don't want this thread deleted! Every time you make a post I'm going to link to this lest anyone forget when challenged you fold like a garage sale card table! What an embarrassment you are- unable to supply ONE SINGLE example to prove your point! Sad sad sad.....
Emily Litella!
#46I So Smart, I can Count to A!
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:33pm
SO are you,after all you 'claim' you voted for him.(LOL)
#47Obama was 'For It' before he was 'Against It'
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:36pm
That's a nice picture but it does not speak truth to power.
Obama is trying to have it both ways, and at least 70% of the American people know it.
LOL
#48The Count is DESPERATE......and is a LIAR!
Posted: 8/17/10 at 9:48pm
Report abuse.Hijacking a thread is a good reason to notify Craig and Rob.Disrupting the forum is exactly what he is doing.
Videos




