Rosie's Kid with Bullets- Page 5

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:12am

nice lies, but as usual with the truther community, devoid of facts.
rebuttal to the truthy movement's lies

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:30am

As Rosie would put it same, same, same.

At the end of the day like I said before, questions remain. Questions that have nothing to with physics or sciences. If we took Bush's advice we would believe every word the 9/11 Commision's Report and not Popular Mechanics which may or may not coincide.

Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. These articles over the years have debunked very little in the way of serious theories and questions. Instead they attack and generalize silly claims that exist.

Just because one person supposes say "no planes hit the WTC" (despite video) it does not mean everyone believes it. We are not all crazy. I would like you to tell that to a room full of NYC firemen and see their response.

Popular Mechanics is just one of the many media outlets that has used the Fox style song and dance to avoid the real issues. Focus on the bogus or irrelevant and avoid the real evidence and questions.

This happens with the Iraq war. Not one major network mentions Oil as being a factor behind the war. They don't even ask it. That is a "conspiracy theory." Right....


P.S.

They are cousins despite any denials. It is a fact.

Updated On: 6/28/07 at 11:30 AM

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:33am

yes, the truthers are all crazy. starting with you.

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:36am

So Papa is the war in Iraq over oil? Or are we fighting to bring freedom there?

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:38am

we're fighting to allow the iraqis the right to propagate insane theories rather than face facts. i'm sorry you lost a loved one, but seriously, get help.

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:45am

What's wrong with asking who paid for these attacks?

What's wrong with asking why the Bush administration helped evacuate the Bin Laden family from the United States?

Why is Osama in Pakistan?

Why did Condi Rice lie under oath and say "no one could have imagined planes being used as weapons" when she was well versed on the topic?

How can the 9/11 Commission Report be considered authoritative when no members of the 9/11 Commission were scientists, engineers, or intelligence experts? All were all tied to war contractors and the airline industry?

Why was 9/11 used to go to war with Iraq, there was no correlation whatsoever?

The list goes on and on... These are not theories. They are questions.

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:49am

why ask why? drink bud dry.

i love how you choose these issues since they sound less batsh*t crazy than the core beliefs that you cling to like suicide vest wearing jihadist to a detonator.

[tazber]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:51am

Why is Osama in Pakistan?

Is there any proof that he is in Pakistan?

What's wrong with asking who paid for these attacks?

I don't think Al Queda would be willing to show us their bookkeeping records.

Why did Condi Rice lie under oath and say "no one could have imagined planes being used as weapons" when she was well versed on the topic?

Knowing the damage a plane can cause and presuming someone would do it are two different things. I know a gas truck could blow up a lot of things, but how exactly am I to stop one from being hi-jacked and used as a bomb?

Why was 9/11 used to go to war with Iraq, there was no correlation whatsoever?

I thoght WMDs were the reason we attacked.

Just a few possible answers.

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 11:55am

You don't know what I believe concerning 9/11. I have never stated anything other than contempt for the 9/11 commission. You don't know me.

Even if I did list "bat sh!t" crazy theories, why would it matter? You still can't answer the serious questions I listed.

You are just like Fox. Song and dance, song and dance. You and HD drink the same crap.

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:01pm

the difference is, hd's not real, i prefer single malt scotch, and yer still batsh*t crazy and in need of more help than a calendar full of interventions, group therapy sessions and enough 'lectro shock to power the east coast until 2073.

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:07pm

>>>Is there any proof that he is in Pakistan?

There is more evidence that he is in Pakistan than there was evidence for WMD's in Iraq. If he isn't there then why is he still at large?

>>I don't think Al Queda would be willing to show us their >>bookkeeping records.

That's not an excuse. There are records out there, the government froze several accounts directly after 9/11. Why not at least investigate it? Whomever paid for these attacks pulls the strings. Maybe it's because they live in Saudi Arabia?

>>>Knowing the damage a plane can cause and presuming someone would do it are two different things. I know a gas truck could blow up a lot of things, but how exactly am I to stop one from >>being hi-jacked and used as a bomb?

She knew that there was plan to hijack planes in the US and hit targets to kill people. At the very least she could have called the FAA and given them a heads up. You know I have met security guards who worked at those airports the day of 9/11. Do you know what they felt like knowing they let those people on the planes with box cutters?


>>>I thoght WMDs were the reason we attacked.

Well it changes everyday. But leading up to the Iraq war, the Bush lead disinformation campaign had 60% of the population believing Sadaam had ties to Al Qaeda. Guess what? They still believe it. All lies.

>>>>Just a few possible answers.

They sound like conspiracy theories to me.

[tazber]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:15pm

There is more evidence that he is in Pakistan than there was evidence for WMD's in Iraq. If he isn't there then why is he still at large?

That's not an answer. Provide your evidence.

That's not an excuse. There are records out there, the government froze several accounts directly after 9/11. Why not at least investigate it? Whomever paid for these attacks pulls the strings. Maybe it's because they live in Saudi Arabia?

They did investigate it. And they stopped the flow of cash from reaching Al Queda after 9/11. You imply that they knew of these accounts before hand. I'm sorry, I don't accept that.Without something more compelling here, this point is moot.


She knew that there was plan to hijack planes in the US and hit targets to kill people. At the very least she could have called the FAA and given them a heads up. You know I have met security guards who worked at those airports the day of 9/11. Do you know what they felt like knowing they let those people on the planes with box cutters?

I can't imagine how they felt, but hindsight is always 20/20.


Well it changes everyday. But leading up to the Iraq war, the Bush lead disinformation campaign had 60% of the population believing Sadaam had ties to Al Qaeda. Guess what? They still believe it. All lies.

If it changes every day, does you point only hold true on specific days?

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:18pm

Speaking of therapy Papa, it's amazing what the homosexual conversion has done for you. Who knew a gay guy could get married to a real woman! I'm glad you use the "off-topic" section of this website, it's certainly the more butch of the two. All that Broadway talk might go straight to your.. well groin. Good job, you prove there is hope for us all.

I can't wait till I'm straight. I can then join the military and be excepted by the general population. Ohh and football matches!

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:22pm

ah, now there's the mejusthategaysjewsandmyselfmostofall that we've all come to expect. when pushed, accuse someone of being the worst thing you can think of: gay. nicely done. now see if you can stop smashing the mirrors.

[mejusthavingfun]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:46pm

Taz,

You can find this and a lot more online. Not from crazy sites, the NY Times sometimes does little tibits. Just look around.


>>That's not an answer. Provide your evidence.

There was a letter sent from Atiyah Abd al-Rahman to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in December 01 that stated he was there. It was confirmed military and counterterrorism officials. That ran in the Washing Post.

In September 04 Pakistan's president had tntelligence Osama bin Laden is alive and Lt. Gen. David Barno stated that there was little evidence he was in Afghanistan and likely in remote Pakistan where we were not looking.

The CIA closed the Osama Bin Laden unit last June. George Bush is not longer looking for him. It is my opinion that man will live out the rest of his life a free man.

We went to war with Iraq over some forged document alluding to Sadaam buying aluminum tubes.

>>>They did investigate it. And they stopped the flow of cash from reaching Al Queda after 9/11. You imply that they knew of these accounts before hand. I'm sorry, I don't accept >>that.Without something more compelling here, this point is moot.

They did not stop the cash flow, as you know a lot of finance can be untraceable. The fact is we don't even have a document that says that much.

Senator Bob Graham had this to say a few years ago (one of the FEW ever to mention this) "I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing -- although that was part of it -- by a sovereign foreign government and that we have been derelict in our duty to track that down, make the further case, or find the evidence that would indicate that that is not true and we can look for other reasons why the terrorists were able to function so effectively in the United States. "

It has not been done.



>>I can't imagine how they felt, but hindsight is always 20/20.

Well foresight is her damn job.


>>If it changes every day, does you point only hold true on >>specific days?

If my point it the US Government lies to the people about Iraqi oil, yes it holds. If we are to believe the everchanging GOP story about Iraq, nothing I say makes any sense.

[papalovesmambo]

Posted: 6/28/07 at 12:48pm

...nothing i say makes any sense.

well, at least you managed one fact in there.