Okay, so I had a minute, y'all. lol
Toward end of episode 8, bulletin board at Byers home, decorated with Christmas cards, a holiday ribbon/book marker(?), and four newspaper clippings.
Two out of four clippings, I can only make out the headlines. The other two, I've transcribed as best I can.
Clipping #1, the one with Will's photo:
Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content
THE BOY WHO CAME BACK TO LIFE
The former missing child Will Byers has been found after a week of searching. He is presently in stable conditon in Hawkins General Hospital. Byers' mother, Joyce Byers alleges that Will was the subject of a secret government program run by the Hawkins National Laboratory. The allegation comes amidst a massive investigation into the hidden organization and its elaborate experimentations in perusal of mind control.
The abuse detailed in the first report includes prolonged physical duress and psychological interrogation. This (government) sanctioned torture has (provoked) outrage amongst the American (people). In a statement issued yesterday (morning), Ives mentioned her "disgust" (with) the organization saying, "our own (American) people are being treated like the (enemy)...we should be directing our (attention) to the real target, the Soviets, not (our) own daughters and sons." Under legal (advice) Brenner has issued no comment on
(rest of article cut off; words above in parentheses are guessed, from context and letters that were visible)
Clipping #2, mid left from article with the photo, header is:
Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content
HAWKINS LAB BLOCKS INQUIRY
Can't make out enough of it to bother, would put my eyes out trying.
Clipping #3, below one with the photo; caption reads:
Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content
CORONER ARRESTED FOR FALSIFYING AUTOPSY
(can't read/decipher article)
Clipping #4, to the right of the clipping with Will's photo; wondering what this one is about, why it's with the other clippings here. No one named seems to be a character in the show this season. The article doesn't seem to me to have much to do with the headline either, or am I just dim?
Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content
MORE HEADS ROLL IN ONGOING STATE TROOPER SCANDAL
By M. ?
For the past few days, Carroll County State's Attorney Thomas E. Hickman has been advancing the argument that large contributions from defense lawyers were responsible for bouncing him from his post after 20 years. He maintains that they contributed to his primary opponent, Republican turned Democrat turned Republican Jerry F. Barnes, because he won't be "hard-nosed with [criminals] like we are."
If Mr. Hickman made his argument in passing in the heat of a bitter election night, no further discussion would be needed. However, since Mr. Hickman persists in advancing it at every turn and will probably fashion it as the focal point of a possible write-in campaign in November, this argument needs to be put in its place.
Four years ago when Mr. Barnes and Mr. Hickman faced off, Mr. Hickman narrowly won by a margin of about 600 votes out of 31,500 cast in the general election. Any political handicapper worth his salt would have expected another close race. Not only were they running in the Republican primary, which has fewer votes, but Mr. Hickman hasn't had a stellar run these past four years with major cases getting reversed on appeal and controversies dogging his drug task force. As expected, the race was again close, only this time Mr. Barnes won by a mere 172 votes.
Did campaign contributions from defense attorneys make the decisive difference, as Mr. Hickman maintains, or was it some other factor? Mr. Barnes was the clear-cut victor in the campaign contributions race -- collecting $23,354 to Mr. Hickman's $8,965. That alone may explain why Mr. Barnes won. Eliminate the defense bar contributions and Mr. Barnes' campaign treasury is still nearly twice the size of Mr. Hickman's.
Mr. Hickman relied heavily on his staff for his contributions. Attorneys, secretaries and investigators associated with his office provided a fifth of all the incumbent's money. Did Mr. Hickman shake down his staff for donations? That argument would be as ludicrous as Mr. Hickman saying that defense lawyers bought Mr. Barnes.
formerly JbaraFan1 8/14/04-2/14/16
Updated On: 7/29/16 at 04:07 PM