Mr Roxy,
Hillary's MANDATE is one of a few points of contention that made me drift towards Obama. I'm opposed to any plan that goes after wages with no provision for an individual to opt-out because in my mind it borders on coercion.
Sure, let's mandate coverage for children (and young adults) because what is often lost in the debate is the fact that many young adults aged 18 - 22 yrs old are dropped from their parents' employer-brokered by default unless they're enrolled in a college/univ as a financial dependent. However, all bets are off for adults beyond that range.
There are simply too many variables at play to force the entire population into one pool. There's little incentive to adopt a healthly lifestyle if in the end the most health conscious are going to subsidize those adults who live their lives with wreckless abandon.
I mean if there's one pool, would the insurers bid on providing coverage with no gov't restraint in commerce? Or, should there be those oft-maligned government set-asides for female-owned, small business, and minority-owned insurers?
#FactsMatter...your feelings not so much.
Updated On: 2/12/08 at 06:09 PM