Where is Suri?
#50At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 5:05pm
I agree, this IS like "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf."
Wonder how long they'll keep it up. I mean who does that to a birth certificate? That little document follows you around your whole life, so you don't want to have some unidentifiable "friend" with crappy penmanship scribbling on it.
As I said on another thread: She'll soon be known as "Suri With the Freak Called 'Pop'."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
#51At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 6:07pm
Yes, Kringas, it is. But not given to me at birth - a few years ago I decided to take a middle name for myself, which I have discussed here more than once.
My parents did not give me a middle name. There is not one on the birth certificate.
#52At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 6:12pm
Betcha don't have a belly-button EITHER!
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
#53At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 6:13pmIt's an innie.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#54At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 11:09pm
"Chicks and bees and bugs better scurry/When I take you out in the Suri..."
[/bad joke]
#55At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 11:16pm
A bad joke that's been made dozens of times.
and isn't it, "Chicks and ducks and geese?"
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#56At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/10/06 at 11:35pmIt probably is. I never listen to "The Surrey with the Fringe on Top".
#57At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 12:26amMe either. We did the show in High School.
Kringas
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/27/05
#58At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 1:47am
But not given to me at birth - a few years ago I decided to take a middle name for myself, which I have discussed here more than once.
But you said you didn't have a middle name. You didn't say you weren't born with it, you said you didn't have one.
As for you discussing it on here more than once, I'm sure that's probably the case.
Cruel_Sandwich
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/30/05
#59At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 2:04amBabies are weird anyway. They're impossible to talk to, they don't appreciate the finer works of the French New Wave, and they speak as if they're trying to do an impression of The Man From Another Place from Twin Peaks and failing miserably.
#60At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:36am
News from the Cruise Camp is that they had to fire their original casting director when she brought home a chinese refugee child thinking that Tom and Katie might like to "go in a different direction" for Suri.
BTW - did anyone notice that Cruise's sister was fired (or quit?) before this whole TomKat thing? Is it possible that she wouldn't be a party to this "project" ?
#61At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:59amgood thing that the baby is not gay or we wouldn't be able to do all this speculation!
PED
#62At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 4:49pm
She actually IS gay. That's why there is a need for an understudy.
She was here, she just got wiped with all the morning posts.
#63At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 4:52pmDespite rumours, Tom Cruise did not threaten legal action and force BWW to shut down to remove offending posts :)
RachLaura
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/13/05
SweetQintheLights
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/12/05
#66At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 7:06pm
"she's been spotted according to E! news"
And that's what we call hallucination
#67At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:45pm
from a yahoo article:
"But Suri remains unseen, which is not unusual for a Cruise child. When he and Nicole Kidman were married, their two adopted children weren't photographed until 1996, when son Conor Anthony was a year old and daughter Isabella Jane was 3."
i say good for them.
PED
#68At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:52pmIt is the way is SHOULD be. But this is the couple that announces everything and make it a photo opportunity. There was never an are they or aren't they like with typical celebtrity couples. It's just surprising that they are not on the cover of People.
#69At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 9:04pm
"But you said you didn't have a middle name. You didn't say you weren't born with it, you said you didn't have one.
As for you discussing it on here more than once, I'm sure that's probably the case."
I don't have one - officially. I have not gone to court and filed papers. Good enough?
And as for your last crack - you're beginning to sound like 4 other people. Being yourself might work better for you.
#70At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/11/06 at 9:15pmThis is TomKat we're talking about. Everything they did was snapped by the press, so why should their new born baby (the reason everything was snapped) be any different?
Cruel_Sandwich
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/30/05
Wildcard
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/21/06
#72At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/12/06 at 1:51pm
Here's my opinion... Angelina and Brad's baby pictures sold for abt. $4M. Tom and Katy reportedly tried to sell a photo of Suri but the biggest bid came to abt. $3M. I guess they felt that their baby's photo was worth more than that and withdrew the opportunity for photos.
Now with all this "Where's Suri" controversy, the price for a Suri photo will have value again, hence giving some PR to Mr. Cruise.
#73At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/12/06 at 1:55pm
Personally, I agree that a baby's life should be private and not media blitzed - and can understand the secrecy.. however. Whoring out pictures to the highest bidder is disgusting
I wonder if that goes in the baby book.
Weight: 7lbs 2 oz
Height: 21 inches
Sex: Female
Hair: Brown
Eyes: Brown
Some photos in the hospital
and then one photo that says "This photo put 3 million dollars in mommy and daddy's pocket"
#74At Barbour's house
Posted: 7/12/06 at 2:04pmWell, with Brad and Angelina that wasn't the case. They decided to sell the photos so that the money could be given to charity. They said that if they could raise THAT much money for the needy, they felt guilty for NOT doing it. To most other celebrities I would say bulls**t, but Angelina gives a VERY high percentage of all of her income to charity.
Videos





