did CNN cancel Soledads show for attracting too many minorities?- Page 4

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:15pm

You've edited previous posts, so just like that.

[suestorm]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:22pm

ok thanks

Updated On: 1/31/13 at 05:22 PM

[Jungle Red]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:25pm

Just like that.

[CarlosAlberto]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:33pm

@ sue: that title change is still misleading. it's obvious you are doing it on purpose and you have an agenda.

it's also clear to me you are either abby or mikey or both.

and before you accuse me of "attacking " you let me just state that is not the case. i am simply making a statement and expressing an opinion.

oh and you forgot the apostrophe in the word Soledad's.


Updated On: 1/31/13 at 05:33 PM

[Jungle Red]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:35pm

CNN canceled the show because it didn't attract enough viewers, minorities or not.

So there.

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:38pm

Abby was criticized for just posting in political threads, so I think maybe sue is going out of her way to post in every thread there is over on the main board in an effort to assimilate.

Sad, terribly sad, as Dollpop might say.

[Unknown User]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:45pm

Sue I appreciate you answering my question but I truly hope you are under 12. Your reasoning skills are very bad and your ability to present facts to buttress your opinion are horrible.

You say all news media toes the party line and all news media is biased. Why do you say that? You try to use "MSNBC doctored the George Zimmerman tapes" when in fact it was a local NBC affiliate in Miami that did that and the resulting tape was played on the Today Show. I cited examples of the non- opinion news coverage and the 4 hour block of conservative opinion broadcast daily on MSNBC to try to demonstrate that MSNBC is not "toeing any party line" and while you have repeatedly said that you never responded to that fact. You even bemoaned MSNBC for "bouncing all over the place" with it's opinions (which is exactly what a news organization should do) and praised Fox for it's "consistency" in always toeing the party line which you now abhor. Could you explain?

Updated On: 1/31/13 at 05:45 PM

[Jungle Red]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 5:48pm

I'm still waiting to hear about Sue's family friends who own all of those franchises because that supports her claim that Obamacare ruins small businesses.

The same thing could be said here.

I think.

[suestorm]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 6:03pm

Joe I like a good debate and will gladly continue this debate with you on PM tmw if you like but I can't go 10 to 1 against all the intolerant meangirls abd bitter queens who sit in judgement and have nothing to add but namecall and flamethrow.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 6:06pm

Sue, I've been nice to you, but throwing around terms like "bitter queen"? Now you're on you own.

[Jungle Red]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 6:13pm

The lack of space bar use is enough for me to dump her.

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 6:17pm

Well...so much for the moratorium.

[Unknown User]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 6:19pm

Nope Jag it's back. Sorry as I said I had no idea when I saw a "new" poster.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 6:20pm

I wasn't convinced Sue was a troll.

Now I just don't care.

[suestorm]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 7:18pm

If you guys want to be fair read the thread from the start. if you don't want to. though that's fine. i stated my opinion and if you don't agree with it that's fine. but to automatically dismiss me because i don't goose step the party line is more on you then me. it smacks of McCarthyism. i would rather you not respond then at all. and to silence me by claiming i am someone else is just lame ...it dumb .... it's like saying I have a fat ass.... I know I don't have a fat ass so why would that bother me?

Reggie i am truly sorry i offended you. that was not my intent .

Jay not sure if you are stalking me or as another poster said your leprosy is aacting up but you'll see in my history I've been posting on numerous non political threads since i joined

Joe sorry you feel that way i thought we were having a nice debate. you asked me to answer your questions and I did I'm sorry you just didn't get the answer you wanted.

That's all for now. my conscience is clear. Thank you.

[~tiny~]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 7:21pm

Why are we engaging the troll? Self control people, self control.

[Jungle Red]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 7:35pm

"it smacks of McCarthyism."

McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence. It also means "the practice of making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially in order to restrict dissent or political criticism."

So, yes, if you're implying that we are making "unfair allegations", that's fair.

[~tiny~]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 7:39pm

I give up/ I guess you guys LIKE to engage the trolls. Oh, well, I tried.

[suestorm]

Posted: 1/31/13 at 7:52pm

Thank you JUNGLE I really do appreciate that. xo