Nobodyhome, I think there are a few; if Cerveris gets nominated, that's one, because they were up against each other just a few years ago and Cerveris won. Even without Cerveris, though, the notion that he "deserved to win" back then might come back, if people feel that way. Contrary to what you said, I'd assume there's something underlying in the fact that none of Doyle's actors got awards last year, which could possibly work in his favor if the powers that be feel they should strongly consider one this year. I've said this before, but I think putting him above the title almost assumes success come Tony time, but I also think the strategy could work both ways. I don't think this is comparable to Chitty in several ways, not the least of which is that that was a season with a much, much longer list of eligible actors for the category. Chitty was also not the kind of show in which it would really matter who played the parts. It was well-cast, but in the grand scheme, I can't imagine many people gave a damn who was in it. A lot of these sound sort of inconsequential, and they may not matter -- but, they may very well, too. This stuff rarely makes sense.
I know I'm probably making quite a few excuses, but I'm still hopeful. Maybe too much so in light of my bias, which I don't hide, but hopefully don't allow to go so far that my two cents are discounted.

And being that so much of it IS political, obviously there's no real telling what will matter and what won't. It's totally premature to assume he's got it in the bag. I'll certainly live if the crapshoot falls differently, but I'd like to see him get what I think he deserves.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 11/19/06 at 12:28 PM