You all really seem to underestimate the drawing power of several factors.
1. Green Day: Green Day is HUGE. They fill up stadiums worldwide. "American Idiot" itself went six times platinum. That means it sold 5 MILLION COPIES.
2. The cast: American Idiot screams "FANGIRL SHOW". Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, you can't deny that it will draw the "Spring Awakening" demographic. That's not to say that fangirls can keep a show afloat, but they can't hurt - look at Next to Normal, still chugging along.
3. The subject matter: Just like Hair draws boomers looking to relive their glory days, American Idiot will draw Generation Y, because this is finally a show FOR US. It speaks to the sense of complacency and boredom that comes with any teenager, as well as those of us who grew up in front of screen after screen, watching as towers fell, as celebrities were made and destroyed one by one, as a nation felt the need to have their own viewpoints heard.
I will compare American Idiot to Hair again and again. The main criticsm I've heard so far is that it has a thin plot, or thin characters, or that the book is sparse. Well, yeah, all of those are true. But come on now. Many of you who bash this show have been fawning over Hair for months. Hair has less of a plot and less character development than American Idiot by FAR. At least stuff "happens" in American Idiot, and the songs drive the story to some degree. What frustrates me about Hair is that it so often feels meandering and directionless, with characters saddled with only one dimension, and mostly forced to speak lines of awful dialogue and participate in unintelligible plotlines just to get to the next time they can sing another song and molest audience members. Anyone who bashes American Idiot while sucking at Hair's teat needs to rethink why they really hate the show. American Idiot has a concrete plot. It may not be elaborate, but at least it's better than Hair's semblance of a storyline.
Oh, and MusicSnob/JazzSquare/TooDarnHot/The Charleston or whatever you're calling yourself now? It's kind of idiotic to criticize the book of a rock opera because a ROCK OPERA HAS NO BOOK. It's completely sung through, with an occasional short monologue by John Gallagher Jr. Saying that this show needs serious work on its book is like saying that "Avatar" sucked ass because it had no musical numbers.
I think American Idiot is a novel, inventive show with a spectacular score that speaks to a generation that has still been neglected by the American theatre. Criticize it if you want, but don't criticize it for not having something that BY DEFINITION it should not have, and don't criticize it for the same reasons you worship Hair.
Formerly SirNotAppearing - Joined 3/08