I saw it this afternoon as well. I took a day-trip to Hartford from the city just for the show. I don't regret my decision to see it in the slightest, as I love the movie and was very eager to see it onstage. Also I will be studying abroad when it opens on Broadway, and this was possibly my only chance. I'm very glad I saw it, but I have to confess the show itself ended up being somewhat disappointing.
The book has many differences from the movie, some of which were very good decisions. But the result is that some things got muddled in the process. There are several plot elements that I found confusing, inconsistent, and/or unfulfilling in this musical, some of which didn't need to be changed from the movie. Much of the dialogue also felt forced to me, clumsily designed to move us from one song to the next. I definitely think the book is what needs the most work, which is almost always the case for new musicals.
The score, on the other hand, was quite beautiful. I find Ahrens and Flaherty to be a bit of a mixed bag, and this musical was no exception, but for the most part and I think the songs were well-written and well-placed. Though there are some clunky lyrics, the songs develop the characters and plot well, and many of the new songs have some lovely melodies. I liked the decision to move "Journey to The Past" to the end of act one, especially given the changes they've made to the book. Anya's new "I Want" song is called "In My Dream" and it's very beautiful.
The performances were fine. Nobody did a bad job, but to be honest I feel like most of the casting decisions were -- for lack of a better word -- boring. They just didn't do anything for me, and I feel like there are many other actors out there who could have just done more with the roles. Again, none of them did a BAD job, they just didn't really impress me at all. With the major exceptions of John Bolton and Caroline O'Conner, who gave my favorite performances.
The costumes are gorgeous, and the lighting and set are both quite good, but those damn LED screens drove me freaking crazy. They were so bizarre, out of place, distracting, over-wrought and unnecessary. I'm not opposed to the use of those technologies in shows when they are well-utilized and fit the style of the show, but these LED screens were just garish, with ugly and nauseating video that struck me as an attempt to make the visuals more cinematic. I had the same problems with the LEDs in Gentleman's Guide. Why does Tresnjak feel like he has to try to trick us into thinking we're watching a movie? Audiences can suspend our disbelief enough to know that the train is moving without being shown a weird nauseating animation of the Russian countryside flying by. It felt horribly misguided, and it pains me to know that this ones giant misstep is unlikely to be fixed for Broadway.
As you can tell, I had very mixed feelings, but there was a lot about the show that I liked. And even if the book was messy, I still think it's a beautiful story. I'm glad they will have time to work on this before they go to Broadway, and I pray to the theatre gods that Tresnjak cuts the LEDs, though I know it will not happen.
Updated On: 5/29/16 at 09:53 PM