i finally read all of these posts now, and all i have to say is that I am glad some of you people - who happen to be opinions i genuinely tend to agree with - were really mesmerized by the show like i was.
it is captivating and endearing (in it's own strange way).
billy and i were absolutely floored.
because i had heard mixed things during the previews, i was scared to see one of my favorite shows not up-to-par.
but it was everything i could have asked for and MORE.
mantello's direction and brill's set design were beatifully crafted and clean. cerveris was brilliant and very different from garber's original approach to the character. neil patrick harris sang the balladeer much better than i had planned, which made me extremely happy! cantone was hilarious, though probably unavoidably a little feminine for Byck - it worked in a way. Garrison (who apparently couldn't even sing the correct notes during previews) and Baker gave awesome performances - their scenes are so well-written. I liked the counterpoint relationship between the Proprietor and the Balladeer, though it has been criticized by many.
Although it's such a small role, I thought Barbour gave such an incredibly honest performance as the reserved Czolgosz. Fantastic work.
This is the kind of show you wish they had a Best Ensemble Tony for...
I must say however - like much of Sondheim's work - Assassins is not for everyone, which is why I think it was the bipolarity of the reviews were so evident. In addition, I must say that I felt reviewers didn't truly understand Assassins' intent. The vaudevilian vignettes, not a thru-book musical, etc. were taken out of context, or perhaps taken with TOO much regard for contextulization.
i hope that kinda made sense. it's late and i need to get this paper done.
i wish RedHot and Joey would have introduced themselves. :)
But I won't live alone in a house of regret.
Updated On: 4/28/04 at 01:44 AM