BROOKLYN review by Munk — Page 2

#26

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:07am

I really wish the show would close to. The cast, and when I say cast I mean Ramona Keller, needs to move on to bigger and better things. And SPELLING BEE needs to open there.

Namo - I LOVE your icon, it's brilliant. I'm considering going to see that, is it worth it?

---

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#27

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:11am

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
hhhaaavvveee toooo ddeessstrroooyy bbbaasshhherrrss!!

---

http://www.BrooklynTheMusical.info

#28

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:15am

IM me tiny toon, I want to understand your madness.

---

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#29

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:17am

Don't hurt yourself, Munkustrap.

#30

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:20am

That sounded mean!

---

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#31

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:26am

Takes one to know one.

#32

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:26am

Snap.

---

"One no longer loves one's insight enough once one communicates it."

The opposite of creation isn't war, it's stagnation.

#33

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 12:35am

i think this show belongs to off broadway...not to broadway...only 5 people in the cast...it sux!!!! ramona is the only good thing in the show...but def not enough.

---

"People have their opinions and that doesn't mean that their opinions are wrong or right. I just take it with a grain of salt because opinions are like as*holes, everyone has one". -Felicia Finley-

#34

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 3:32am

"i think this show belongs to off broadway...not to broadway."

Off-Broadway deserves (and 99% of the time is) something far better than Brooklyn. Most of the best plays and many of the best musicals come out of Off-Broadway theatre (including the vast majority of the Pulitzer-prize winners of the last two decades).

---

"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie [http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/] "The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney

#35

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:42am

"i think this show belongs to off broadway...not to broadway...only 5 people in the cast...it sux!!!! ramona is the only good thing in the show...but def not enough"

A cast with five people does not have to suck.

Example: "Ain't Misbehavin'" - winner Best Musical.

---

"Smart! And into all those exotic mystiques -- The Kama Sutra and Chinese techniques. I hear she knows more than seventy-five. Call me tomorrow if you're still alive!"

#36

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 6:43am

everyone says "ramona this, and ramona that" and YES she is VERY, VERY talented, but I think people are quick to forget about the others in the cast. I can't speak on behalf of the material they are give in "brooklyn," but I do know that individually they are ALL amazing, and ALL deserve to be "the best part of the show"...if it is so poorly written, as many say, disregard material, and you must base it ONLY on talent.

---

awkward.

"I think it was the Korean tour or something. They were all frickin' asian!" -Zoran912

#37

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 10:16am

The review sounds like it was written by a high school freshman in a bad mood. Gimme a break. If you go into a show wanting to hate it you will.

---

Faced with these Loreleis, what man can moralize!

#38

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 10:44am

really? i thought it was well-written... are you angry because it's a negative review?

#39

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 10:45am

On the contrary, I thought that was a good review. Munk stated what he liked (set), why he liked it (realistic), what he disliked (everything else), why he disliked it (horrible), and what to do to fix it (throw it all out).

Oh, munk, hope your ears have healed

#40

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 10:46am

I feel the same about that "love to hate me, but it's still love" line. It's ridiculous. Some people love to molest children. Some people love to torture and kill animals. What point is being made with that line? She's trying to allude that a figure of speech and an emotion are one in the same because they share a common word.

---

"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian

#41

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 10:59am

Well this musical is certainly a love it or hate it kind of show. The audiences I've seen responded with great enthusiasm, and I loved seeing it myself despite a few lines that leave me scratching my head. Regarding the performances though, I'm most surprised by your great dislike of Cleavant Derricks, as I considered his performance one of the great highlights!

#42

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 11:04am

When I saw Cleavant he was very hoarse. Not very enjoable. Maybe I would have liked him better if he wasn't, but I was left unimpressed by him also.

---

I want to write music. I want to sit down right now at my piano and write a song that people will listen to and remember and do the same thing every morning...for the rest of my life. - Jonathan Larson. Tick, Tick...BOOM!

#43

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 1:50pm

He was VERY hoarse, and when he sang he had trouble hitting the notes, and it just sounded awful.

And the one thing that really did not make sense to me, hopefully someone can answer this for me - but I wouldn't be surprised if there is no logical explanation...at the end when Taylor or STreetsinger or WHATEVER his name is, why does he hold Brooklyn's father's guitar and say "faith, I'll always love you." Did he magically know Faith...in France? I was so confused.

---

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#44

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:05pm

Ok Munk, Queen know it all. You can Shut Up now.

#45

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:07pm

Munk, by the looks of your review, you're becoming kind in your old age.

#46

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:20pm

Saw it once, won't see it again. It wasn't horrible, but wasn't good. I enjoyed Good Vibrations more.

#47

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:23pm

Mobstar, what are you talking about? Am I not allowed to give a review on the show? I bet if I had bad taste and loved it, you'd be fine with that.

mef - I didn't think that was a kind review! Did you see BKLYN? Do you agree or not? It seriously is the worst show I have ever seen.

---

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#48

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:26pm

Yes, I've seen BROOKLYN. That's why I thought your review was kind.

#49

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:27pm

What's mobstar's deal?

---

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#50

re: BROOKLYN review by Munk

Posted: 2/16/05 at 4:30pm

I don't know. He liked BKLYN, so how reliable can he really be?