^^ Agree with both of you. I wish I had seen TKAI so I could comment on that particular show, as well.
The reason I didn't see it though is due to time constraints, and the fact that I have seen it so many times. Including the Lou Diamond Phillips version. I wanted to try something different, never having seen OTT or OTTC.
I was blown away by two shows that could be easily disregarded as dated, and are viewed that way by many. Yet there was definite life breathed into both of them. You're right.
And the performances were outstanding.
I have to say that in addition to seeing Chita again, Yazbeck and Chenoweth were absolute standouts in their performances for me. Real treats! Yazbeck's "Lonely Town" and "Lucky to Be Me" in OTT. And almost everything Chenoweth belted.
In fact, after seeing OTTC for the first time now, I can see how this show needs phenomenal performances, otherwise it could fall seriously flat.
I guess you could say that about any show though, including The King and I.
But there seems to be more risk involved with OTTC. If the timing is off, it could throw the whole thing. And it wasn't. They hit every mark IMO.
My vote? OTTC or OTT.
On Broadway, it seems like a full proof show such as King should be good if you have good performers. Which this apparently does. The rest should take care of itself. It's such a perfect musical, as it is. That's been proven time and again. I know there's always the difference between good and great. And it sounds like this version of King is being deemed as great.
OTTC though seems like the type of show that could be more risky and could fall flat if not done well. And there seem to be more potential doors for this to happen. The fact it didn't fall flat would make it the standout to me over the full proof aspects of a classic like King.
Similarly, OTT can be often deemed and disregarded as corny and outdated by modern audiences, so it needs some major life to keep audiences focused, as well. And I think it did just that.
"^ Agree with you in every detail."