Broadway Star Joined: 1/28/04
And 60% new score. But it's all in the spirit of the original, of course.
http://www.out.com/entertainment/michael-musto/2014/10/27/dreamgirls-bill-condon-side-show-sherlock-holmes-broadway
They'd be better off in the revival category from a strategic standpoint. At least there, they'd almost certainly be nominated (this all depends on whether "Dames at Sea" or "Can-Can" makes it in this season) and get the coveted spot on the telecast.
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/20/03
I think the subject of Side Show is something people consider a bit too freakish and it will never make a good musical.
Ahem, American Horror Story: Freak Show.
It does pretty well. We'll see...
Broadway Star Joined: 1/28/04
Ryan Murphy happens to be his ex. In the interview, Condon addresses the fact that they're both focused on circus freak themes right now.
I know. It's a nice coincidence for Side Show that American Horror Story is so popular. It may allow Side Show to ride that wave.
It would, if Side Show's marketing were better and played up the freak show-ness rather than making it look white Dreamgirls.
Yes, it would, Kad. The marketing team is missing an opportunity here.
They played up the freak show aspect in the advertising when it ran in DC.
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/20/03
But American Horror Show isn't a stage musical. I think that's one of the reasons why Carrie always had problems. Except for Sweeney Todd, it's difficult to get freakishness into a musical.
They should go back, then. AHS is quite popular and they could possibly snag a portion of that audience.
Kad-since I value your opinion here-do you think they'll successfully petition this into the new musical category? (I still that would be foolish. If no other revivals open, this gets a slot.)
They'd be better off in the revival category from a strategic standpoint
Wait. There's some doubt that this WON'T be in the revival category?
Updated On: 10/27/14 at 12:29 PM
There is absolutely no way this would be considered a revival, regardless of how much is changed. At most, depending on the extent of the revisions (if it is truly indeed a wholly new book), it could be nominated for Best Book.
It appears as though they are marketing it as a new musical. (And for revivals, I'm guessing the committee won't let them have a best score nod. I argue that if you won't let material under the 'classics' rule (like Hedwig last season or others placed there before) have a nod in score, why should this?)
Kad, I assume you mean considered a "new musical." Anyway, I completely agree.
Well, they're in the unfortunate position of reviving a show no one particularly cares about - or knows- outside of the theatre community. There's no point in heralding it as a return, because who knew it was around in the first place?
I don't know the extent of the revisions to the score, but if it is as high as 60% new material, I still think the Tony committee would not allow elgibility. The show already was nominated in that category in 1998.
I just think it's a silly marketing decision. I have no insider info about Dames at Sea or Can-Can, but unless they or Gigi come this season-and they need theaters-Side Show automatically gets a nod-and a slot to perform.
Side Show doesn't necessarily get a nod, it could be snubbed if, for some reason, people find it egregiously bad.
I will say that it will need serious help to survive even toward the nominating period.
I thought some film company was helping with the finances now due to Bill Condon's good offices. (Although how much help they are willing to give isn't really known.)
It could snag the revival nod by default, though.
As of now, the following revivals we're getting this season are:
The King & I
On the Town
On the Twentieth Century
Side Show
Right, which is why I pointed out that unless Dames at Sea, Gigi or Can-Can opens this season, Side Show will likely get a nod for revival and land a slot to perform on the telecast.
Videos