Well, I'd think they were assholes, but I think I have a fairly decent enough head on my shoulders to recognize that regardless, they still do great work. People are going to slap my proverbial wrists and tell me this is an idealist lie, but I love them for their work. The fact that they've been nice to me is an added bonus. I certainly didn't, at thirteen, sit around with a list of actors who were notoriously sweet to their fans and decide that I was going to go flail about and fangirl Adam Pascal. I was a shy, frightened, out-of-place child, and he was nice to me. But that didn't win me over, or make me remember his name; it was his voice. So to answer your questions, I would think less of them personally, but (even for how much I love meeting people whose work I love, and for how much fun it is), I think I can separate their talent on stage from their personality flaws. I've seen them both be extremely difficult, and it doesn't change how I feel about their work, or how I think of them overall. And, to assume that that would be the case is to consider someone awfully dense and shallow, if you ask me.
If you're going to allow something like that to really alter your overall perception of these people, then you admire them for the wrong reasons, or your admiration is at the very least imbalanced, with far too much weight on what they give you off stage.
As much fun as it is, that's just not what it's about.
The fact that most people bought tickets to see Three Days of Rain has nothing to do with this. It's got nothing to do with stage door entitlements. Honestly, most people who say Three Days of Rain probably DID buy tickets only because they wanted to see Julia Roberts, so yes, it's "as we all know." But that's got nothing to do with this -- that's about justification of stars as vehicles for plays that otherwise wouldn't be produced. I don't even see the correlation you're trying to draw.
ETA --
Fantabulous - Look who has become famous in the world in which we live. Does people like Paris Hilton or Britney Spears have so much talent? Would you go see them in The Sound of Music? Of course not. People will, though. Why? For the thrill of seeing someone famous. To get an autograph from Britney Spears. To be able to go up to their friends and say "Hey, look at this neat picture I took of Paris Hilton's left earlobe!." Fine. Okay. So that's something to be said about the state of the audience. But just because you've given us the best possible everyday example doesn't make it acceptable! And, further, you're using this to show how and why talent isn't part of the equation, but the problem is that you're saying, in terms of Broadway actors and autographs, that it's not about the talent. This isn't on the level of Paris Hilton mega-stardom, and people don't love these actors for their fame.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 7/3/06 at 02:02 PM