Wick3 said: "jo said: "I wonder if there is no error on the stats submitted by The Lion King?
THE LION KING
MINSKOFF
$4,315,264 (gross receipts for 9 shows)
$2,590,306 (gross receipts for 7 shows)
$1,724,958 (this is the differential between the 2 weeks -- did the show average $ 862 Thousand each for each additional show the past week? Or assuming it was a trend for the last week, did it average $ 479 thousand per day in the past week? It was averaging much less then $ 400 thousand per day in the past)
******************
$284.89 ( did average price exceed the top price charged of $199 - does not seem logical? Especially so that it did not hit 100% in attendance)
$199.00
*****************
15,147 (it did not even hit full capacity)
15,264
Just wondering if there is an error in the stats submitted to Broadway League or as declared by Broadway League?"
I thought so too but not sure as I know Lion King uses Ticketmaster and they tend to have dynamic pricing especially for premium seats. I think the error is the top premium price is not $199 but more likely $600-$700.
From looking at Lion King's grosseshttps://www.broadwayworld.com/grosses/THE-LION-KINGI noticed the top ticket price is all $199. The week before its average ticket price was $226 but top ticket is listed as $199. I have a strong feeling the top ticket was definitely higher than $199.
I know Minskoff has more seats than the Winter Garden but it is amazing that a long-running show with no above the title stars was able to beat Music Man starring Hugh Jackman (which we all know was charging $600 orchestra seats) ... presuming the Lion King numbers are correct.
"
How is the increase of $ 1.724 million for 2 additional shows ( vs the previous week) explained by looking simply at the trend line analysis :
https://www.broadwayworld.com/grosses/THE-LION-KING
In the recent past, they have not been doing anywhere close even to $ 400 thousand a show. Have you heard people all of sudden paying top premium price of $ 600/$700?
Unless they are updating past statistics that were not included in past reports?
Just wondering.
If the stats then are correct -- then good for them! I guess we can validate the new robust trend in next week's report.