Owen i don't care if you cant stand me, i also think you are jumped up moron who cant apologize when he is wrong so i guess that's fine. I WORK as a critic here in the UK for What's on Stage and have written articles for my column here about how a critic is a critic, the only difference is a pay grade. Of course some publications reach further a field, but that is the publication. All i meant was Ben Brantley's opinion is the same as Linda at Newsday etc.
'You know there is only one real "major critic" that makes ANY difference here, right?'
Oh lord, really? yes maybe 30 years ago but i think it's safe to say (and this has bugger all to do with Carrie) that the NY Times review is no longer a make or break publication, if so Wicked would be dead and Lysistrata Jones would be still running.
'A review that says "the show doesn't work, but Mazzie sings well" is NOT a "mixed" review.
A mixed review would say "the show has some problems that could be solved, and works much of the time."
The reviews for this show are almost all negative'
Maybe you should re read the reviews, yes Marin was praised but several things about the show received praise.
The bottom line is people get p****d at me because i have an opinion and stick to it, i verbalize my opinion and don't back down from what i want to say because the usual suspects on here disagree. Is Carrie perfect? No not at all, that is what i have ALWAYS said, i enjoy the show, this production did well (not how i would have done it, as i have always said), it has many flaws (as i have always said) and many issues will never be fixed (as i have always said). However i refuse to jump on the 'oh its a huge flop again' bandwagon when that is not what the critics are saying. Sorry, if you don't like that you know what you can do.
Namo i love u but we get it already....you don't like Madonna
Updated On: 3/2/12 at 10:50 AM