"I was mainly saying how they bring celebrities to star in crappy shows just so people will come see them. It's Only a Play was a perfect example of this. I also really want other unknown actors to get a chance to shine rathwr than the business side of Broadway take over and just cast the cekebs for money reasons. Idk. I am mixed about celebrities on Broadway. My philosophy is if the show is good and they are perfect, sure. But if you are just bringing them in because you know no one will see it unless the celeb is in it, it just gets annoying."
I don't think the intentions of the producers is to produce a crappy show. I think what you're talking about is true in some cases, like in It's Only a Play, as you mentioned (although most of that cast had a lot of experience working in the theatre, which makes their casting a bit less gimmicky IMO). But I haven't found that to be true in most cases. Even if a show does end up being crappy, it's usually not BECAUSE their celebrity kept them from creating a good work.
RE: you're last statement about casting celebrities because it sells seats: Yes, usually casting a star is the tipping point between a show getting produced, and a show not getting produced. Don't we WANT shows to be able to get produced? Celebrities sell tickets. It would be great if every good show could get produced and be successful without a celebrity, but that's just not where we are now, unfortunately.
Take something like The Cripple of Inishmaan: It had never been on Broadway before, this most recent production probably never would have gotten to Broadway without Daniel Radcliffe's attachment. Radcliffe did a great job and got to play a role he really enjoyed, the show was successful, critics and audiences seemed to enjoy it, and I got introduced to McDonagh, who has since become one of my favorite playwrights. The way I see it, everyone wins.
Updated On: 11/9/15 at 08:04 PM