Well, in Act 1, Pity the Child is placed as a last attempt to garner sympathy from the audience. It is placed after Frederick pushes Florence to the brink, and she quits. Of course, it's all in the way it is staged. If Florence isn't onstage, it is a plea to the audience. If she is onstage, it's a plea to her. And since the audience probably sympathizes most with Florence, the audience will side with Florence.
To me, this song should be about Frederick trying to redeem himself. When Florence quits and just leaves him, despite his plea to "pity the child," I think Frederick is left destroyed - leading to his downfall on the chess board.
So, in Act 1, Pity the Child is a plea for love and to save his game.
In Act 2, since he is already done with, the song just seems futile. I don't think we really like him anymore, because of his arrogance. So you have this great, powerful song wasted because he's lost our sympathy already. Furthermore, it is also after Frederick enrages Anatoly during the interview.
I think that the song works better as a last attempt to save his relationship (professionally and emotionally) with Florence. But when she denies it, he is left completely devasted.
I hope that all makes sense.
Now, to me, Anatoly is difficult to manage - and it is better that Florence because the complete protagonist of the story.
The problem is, we ARE in the Cold War and, if the audience is American (ie: on Broadway), it is likely we will sympathize with the US team before learning about the characters. When we see the violent way in which Freddie treats Florence, versus Anatoly's caring, respectful manner, we begin to sympathize with Anataloy. It is at this point when we lose interest and respect for Frederick - the same point Florence quits (like I said, we follow Florence more than anything). This can go back to why "Pity the Child" works best here.
I think the show works best with us not knowing of Anatloy's personal life until Act 2...when Frederick brings up Svetlana. I mean, I think we should know about his family, but from his perspective - so we DO sympathize with him and his yearning of a relationship with Florence.
Now, the question is how should Svetlana be played. This show is very confusing because ACT 2 seems to be more about the political ploys and resolving the relationships. If Svetlana is played as a horrid person, we will still sympathize with Anataloy...and Svetlana becomes rather futile. Also, why would Anatoly return to her?
No, I think Svetlana has to come on the set and seem like the innocent victim. When Anatloy finally sees Svetlana, he realizes he should be with her...and back in his homeland.
To go back to the placement of PITY THE CHILD, and to resolve the relationship between Frederick and Florence, I believe that Frederick trying to help Anatoly out is the true turning point in an attempt to win back Florence.
He's lost sympathy, so words won't win us over. He needs to actually DO something (like Mister in TCP). Freddie needs to help Anatoly and prove he has another side.
The biggest problem is that CHESS has many stories, and many endings. A lot of how we feel is which recording we are used to - or rather, which story we prefer. The show has sort of dug itself into a hole - where it has a huge fan base - but each person prefers a different version of the story. And because of the complexities of the show, the stories can't really be combined.
ETA:
re: The Cold War setting - I don't think it really is dated. It is a historical piece. It is a love story set against the Cold War and how it has affected all parts of life - including sports, like Chess. Sort of like the movie "MIRACLE."
The smallest stream is a valent river. It will drown me if it can.
Updated On: 2/9/06 at 07:50 PM