vls15 said: "I feel conflicted about these rush tickets. Would I love a chance to sit this close to the actors for just $10? You bet! Is it a good idea to give everyone, regardless of their means, an opportunity to secure the best seats in the house? Yes! Do I think it's unfair to put another row of seats, even if they are cushions, in front of those who paid a pretty penny to have an unobstructed view of the stage? That's also a "yes." BTW, I saw a photo in which there was a tall person wearing a hat in one of those onstage seats. I am certain he blocked the view of the person behind him. So I am happy for those who get to enjoy this incredible deal but also a bit sad for anyone who bought Row A center tickets."
Yep!
If they want to do it, fine. But I feel like they need to be more transparent about it. I get it may be a "known thing" for other BAM attendees, but I'm sure for some it's a new experience. I know for me part of the reason I'm willing to pay more for front row (within reason) is because I get nervous with other people in front of me. (Not to mention easily distracted by any movement in front of me.) So to have people at my feet, it would just weird me out, it would just feel uncomfortable. Most people don't like to be first row, but those that do, it's not just because they can. So they needed this to be clearer in their seating plan from the start.
"Hey little girls, look at all the men in shiny shirts and no wives!" - Jackie Hoffman, Xanadu, 19 Feb 2008