DEATH OF A SALESMAN Reviews- Page 2

[Smaxie]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 1:23pm

The New Yorker is a rave.

http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/theatre/2012/03/26/120326crth_theatre_lahr

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 2:17pm

When I read John Lahr and Michael Feingold, I feel as if I am finally accessing the grown-ups table. Brantley is just a terrible writer. Maybe if Linda Emond had been titsier or blonder he would have written one of his patented love letters to her.

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 2:22pm

Has Corine weighed in on this yet?

[SonofRobbieJ]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 2:22pm

The only things Brantley writes well anymore are his pans and his love letters to blondes.

This review left me with nothing. It's like he needed another three days to think about it to formulate an opinion.

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 2:30pm

You're absolutely right. And the love letter would have been headlined: "Widow of a Salesman".

[jstarr2]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 2:38pm

Wow, Curtain Critic score is up and it's a 94, the #1 reviewed show on Bway

http://www.curtaincritic.com/Shows/DEATH_OF_A_SALESMAN_REVIEWS-119.html

[SNAFU]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 2:57pm

I am very excited now to see this on the 29th.

[Smaxie]

Posted: 3/16/12 at 6:04pm

Financial Times is a rave, five out of five stars.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/16b0be20-6eae-11e1-acf0-00144feab49a.html#axzz1pJoZ9UyZ

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 3/20/12 at 9:29pm

Flat out rave from Michael Feingold, the only critic who matters.
It's Miller Time