I hate this totally unnecessary Emmy category. It used to be a real (and rare) accomplishment to score an EGOT: Emmy, Grammy, Oscar and Tony. It meant a mastery in the four different media, usually for different projects. No offense to Erivo, but she is only an Oscar away from her EGOT ... for basically doing the same thing in ''The Color Purple.'' She got a Tony for performing onstage; a Grammy for recording it, and an Emmy for promoting it on ''Today.'' If they make a movie of ''Color Purple,'' Erivo could get her Oscar ... all for the same role. And if Ben Platt and his ''Dear Evan Hansen'' co-stars win the Emmy for singing on ''Today,'' Platt will be three-quarters of his way to an EGOT for doing the same thing.
To me, it cheapens the special distinction of achieving an EGOT. I imagine performers are only too happy to appear on morning and talk shows to promote their albums, movies or shows. They don't need an Emmy to entice them. ... Meantime, there ARE Emmys that are more overdue. It's time to bring back, say, Best Performance in a Variety/Sketch show. Performers from ''Saturday Night Live,'' who get to display their versatility in various skits, should not be thrown into Supporting Actor in a Comedy, to compete with those who have only one regular character to play.
Updated On: 3/23/18 at 12:38 PM