Yes, they do go back and edit a bit and fine tune, on occasion.
It doesn't happen as often as it used to (because it's VERY expensive to go to film multiple times from the editorial). Not like the old MGM days when (as their slogan used to be among the ranks) they "didn't MAKE movies, they REMADE them." Referring to the fact that after test screenings, they would always go back and make major alterations to the film, based on feedback cards. Rewriting endings completely, throwing out whole scenes, re-shooting new ones, and even replacing actors (on a few occasions).
I have been to several advance screenings over the years (as much as six months before the release date), and not once was the final film any different than what I saw (with the exception of adding in a main title sequence, credit roll, final score, VFX and SFX mixing, and color correction).
Dottie---as far as the "second half" losing steam a bit as otis33 mentioned, this has ALWAYS been the problem with Dreamgirls, even when I saw the OBC. That's its one major flaw, IMO, and ultimately the reason it didn't win Best Musical. It's in the writing and the basic story itself. It just fizzles a bit (by comparison to the explosive first half). I know Bill Condon has worked to change that in the film, by altering some plot points. Maybe he didn't go far enough with the Act II tweaking. Or maybe, even with a little "steam lost," the movie has been deemed good enough to go already.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 8/11/06 at 10:26 AM