#1
Posted: 5/5/06 at 10:28pm
I just saw Drowsy. Please, consult this review, and Ben Brantley's (because I agree wholeheartedly with him) if you are looking to see this show.
The show, is a sort of twenties farce, with a man in a chiar, narrating the story, and talking about how much he loves the musical.
He did a whole shpeil (shpeel, however you spell it)about today's theater. He did a terrific job.
In my opinion, he almost saved the show.
Before the plot actually starts, he warns you that the characters are ENTIRELY two-dimensional.
Yes, I understood that part. The execution, however, didn't work out so well.
I didn't like most of the musical numbers. They were, and Ben Brantley puts it, "forgettable." Even at just one hour and forty minutes of showtime, it still felt long. Sutton Foster displays her talents, being just what the role called for (but I love Sutton, so whatever) Everyone did just what they were supposed to. I saw no spark. No fly. No ENERGY.
All the people in the audience (mainly tourists) seemed to be in love with the show.
As I say in the title of this thread...Eh.
I disliked the subplots. The whole show was not very well thought through. I liked The Man in the Chair's character much better. he seemed to stand out.
I say, this whole musical is supposed to be about a guy loving this musical. I cannot see why.
I know some of you guys on this board loved this musical (i have been closely reading the boards) but all I can say is, Eh...
oops, should have added this to Margo's thread. But I wanted this to be fresh, since everyone loved it (Newsday, wsall street journal..etc)
The show, is a sort of twenties farce, with a man in a chiar, narrating the story, and talking about how much he loves the musical.
He did a whole shpeil (shpeel, however you spell it)about today's theater. He did a terrific job.
In my opinion, he almost saved the show.
Before the plot actually starts, he warns you that the characters are ENTIRELY two-dimensional.
Yes, I understood that part. The execution, however, didn't work out so well.
I didn't like most of the musical numbers. They were, and Ben Brantley puts it, "forgettable." Even at just one hour and forty minutes of showtime, it still felt long. Sutton Foster displays her talents, being just what the role called for (but I love Sutton, so whatever) Everyone did just what they were supposed to. I saw no spark. No fly. No ENERGY.
All the people in the audience (mainly tourists) seemed to be in love with the show.
As I say in the title of this thread...Eh.
I disliked the subplots. The whole show was not very well thought through. I liked The Man in the Chair's character much better. he seemed to stand out.
I say, this whole musical is supposed to be about a guy loving this musical. I cannot see why.
I know some of you guys on this board loved this musical (i have been closely reading the boards) but all I can say is, Eh...
oops, should have added this to Margo's thread. But I wanted this to be fresh, since everyone loved it (Newsday, wsall street journal..etc)
"I'm thinking about how if you took the W in
answer, and the H in ghost, and the extra A in aardvark, and the T in listen, you could keep saying WHAT but no one would ever hear you because the whole word would be silent."
Please support BC/EFA at goodsearch.com!
Search for anything, and your charity will get a cent!
Updated On: 5/5/06 at 10:28 PM