I feel like with any show there are people who say that it isn't going to do well once the original cast leaves. I doubt that this is a new thing to happen with Hairspray. I am sure that they will find someone else to play the role.
I have a question because I just don't know. Is the name Michael Ball known to people in England who don't follow musical theatre? Because there are performers in America who do theatre who people would people who don't follow musical theatre or theatre in general would know. These are people who for the most part can't tell you who they saw as Elphaba in Wicked during their last trip in the city. But, they know that Nathan Lane is staring in that new play.
But, back to what I was originally saying, I can't count the number of times I have heard that the because the original cast opened a show then they MUST be the best etc etc. I have always said after a show has run for a number of years that there is a chance that there could be a replacement who is better then the original. Granted, I am not just talking about Hairspray in London or any London show. I have heard theatre fans say the same thing for Broadway shows as well.
I just hope that Hairspray in London can reach the six year mark without having to stunt cast. Unfortunately that is not the case for Broadway.
"If you try to shag my husband while I am still alive, I will shove the art of motorcycle maintenance up your rancid little Cu**. That's a good dear"
Tom Stoppard's Rock N Roll