In a recent interview with Rowling, she said that the one thing that she might consider doing is an Encyclopedia for Harry Potter - something for all us HB geeks to get even though we probably don't NEED it.
From an interview - "JKR: The most likely thing I’ve said this a few times before, would be an encyclopedia in which I could have fun with the minor characters and I could give the definitive biography of all the characters."
I am almost done with my reread (about 50 pages to go) and I picked up on one or two things that I would like some people's opinions on.
1.) I know this is being overly picky, but on the cover you see Dumbledore's right hand seemingly intact (not blackened or dead looking). However, in chapter 23 (titled Horcruxes) in the American edition the drawing at the start of the chapter shows Dumbledore's LEFT hand completely fine. Seems the illustrators missed something. I only noticed it because I kept forgetting which of Dumbledore's hands was hurt.
2.) When Harry meets Trelawney outside the Room of Requirements. Trelawney talks about how the cards are showing something disturbing and that no matter how she shuffles them the same three cards keep surfacing. The three were:
- A lightnight stuck tower (The Astronomy tower with the Dark Mark over it)
- Calamaity and Disaster (Death Eaters and Dumbledor's Death)
Now Trelawney has a fondness for predicting horrible deaths and tragic events. Could this be a case of the boy who cried wolf? After predicting distruction for so long no one seems to be taking any of her claims seriously ( understandably). Maybe Trelawney has a little more talent than we think. Could she possibly play a larger role in the next book?
3.) This is in response to the Dumbledore knew he was going to die/Snape isn't really evil theories. For the first time in any of the books Dumbledore shows signs of aggitation/frustration/sternness towards Harry. Previously he has always responded to Harry with the sort of patience that indicated that he could talk all day. However when Harry refuses to accept that he is equipped with anything useful to fight Voldemort or that Harry thinks Snape is still loyal to Voldemort, Dumbledore has surprisingly little patience. Now I could be reading into all of this; however, I interpreted this as Dumbledore LITERALLY not having the time to debate a 16 yr old boy on the matters. It could be that Dumbledore is seeing that time is precious and he must use all of it to his advantage.
- Also, when Harry tells Dumbledore that he knows it was Snape who told Voldemort about the prophecy it says that Dumbledore hesistated as if he was contimplating telling Harry something but instead he said that he trusts Snape completely. Could he have considered telling Harry the reason why he trusts Snape?
-- Here is the exact quote
"Professor...how can you be sure Snape's on our side?"
Dumbledore did not speak for a moment; he looked as though he was trying to make up his mind about something. At last he said, "I am sure. I trust Serverus completely."
---sorry for the legnth.
I want to write music. I want to sit down right now at my piano and write a song that people will listen to and remember and do the same thing every morning...for the rest of my life. - Jonathan Larson. Tick, Tick...BOOM!
Updated On: 7/20/05 at 01:37 AM