I've never had to good fortune to see Mourning and would love to, but something tells me this production isn't going to be a "traditional" mounting of the play.
Please! reviews def needed. I'm holding the last slot of my sched open for this but really want to know more b4 I commit 4 hrs of my life to see this show.
Assuming it's done in its entirety, the first two parts are very engaging -- it's the third part where the longeurs set it. Christine, the Clytemnestra figure, dies at the end of part two and some people have opined that the play dies when Christine does.
I kind of want to see it just to prove to myself that I can sit through the four and a half hours. Not sure exactly how I got that desire.
No matter how good (or bad) it is, a lot of people will probably be deterred by the running time, and I assume free tickets will start popping up. I think I'll hope for that and wait until then.
Just got out. Five hours long and I was bored every second of it. The performances are laughable, the direction is some of the worst I have EVER encountered, and it feels like a bad community theatre production.
Flamboyantly gay spectacle......so it's the same Scott Elliot who ruined the revival of Threepenny Opera I take it?
I don't WANT to live in what they call "a certain way." In the first place I'd be no good at it and besides that I don't want to be identified with any one class of people. I want to live every whichway, among all kinds---and know them---and understand them---and love them---THAT's what I want! - Philip Barry (Holiday)
Well, I, at least , thank you for saving 4+ hours of my life and time in New York next month. And extend by condolences for your extended period of boredom.:)
Yes. It sucks. Jena Malone outshone Lili Taylor but her part was much more interesting. I had front row seats and had to keep my hand over my mouth so the actors wouldn't hear my laughter.