Saw it early with Joan Allen (PH) and then late with Mary McDonnell, who made the most poignant and moving case for the piece. I am not a fan of the TV movie, as well done as it is, because the play is not pure naturalism (few plays are) and the script belongs on a stage, with distance between audience and performance. Like many plays, with the camera atop its take on "reality," the strain of theatricality is pronounced. And the casting wasn't spot-on. But the play moved so many and had such a profound impact. The one monologue, the big second act bravura speech, defines the era and the moment for women and the movement. It's likely doubly moving (ironically so) today, as woman fight for fundamental rights anew. I'm more a fan of its artistic intentions than its achievements, dramatically, not politically speaking. But reading a handful of privileged white men dismiss the work as agitprop only makes its potency and relevance that much more potentially powerful in a revival.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 1/29/15 at 02:00 AM