How Long till Hairspray in London Flops
Posted: 3/10/07 at 2:56am
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
Updated On: 3/10/07 at 02:56 AM
Posted: 3/10/07 at 3:25am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 3:26am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 3:29am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 8:57am
London loves shows like Hairspray, the big fun shows do so well here especially the ones which aim at a youthful audience(Fame,Footloose, Saturday Night Fever, Dirty Dancing)
Hairspray will be a massive hit here
Posted: 3/10/07 at 9:06am
Updated On: 3/10/07 at 09:06 AM
Posted: 3/10/07 at 9:20am
Cast well- and that means Des Barrett as Edna- the show will have at least 2 years at the Shaftesbury. I worked there years ago and I love it. It's a great venue with great visibility. All it needs is a great show... like Hairspray!!!
Posted: 3/10/07 at 9:24am
Plus the whole curse thing is silly
the shows closed coz most of them were rubbish,
Fame is going in there in a few months and if that show had an open ended run it would go for years because its a massive hit already(i hardly see a theatre changing that)
Posted: 3/10/07 at 9:29am
I think 'Hairspray' could really work over here. I know that it's pretty different to 'Caroline, Or Change', buuut critics really liked 'Caroline...' (and kept comparing it to 'Wicked', which led to a silly period where my housemate and I would say "that green thing's okay, but this is BETTER because it's BLACK!" about anything and everything after a particularly silly article in the Guardian one day) and I remember audience reception being good too. If 'Caroline...' (a modern American musical with a fair ol' bit to say about race) can work, why can't 'Hairspray' (ditto), which is a much brighter, far more fun show? If anything can break the Shaftesbury curse, I reckon 'Hairspray' could. As long as it PUSHES itself and manages to sell the required amount of tickets!
Updated On: 3/10/07 at 09:29 AM
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:22am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:25am
and the UK are a lot more accepting of fun shows than broadway is.
If stuff like the wedding singer, all shook up etc would hve played in london they would have done very well and i think the same will be true about Hairspray.
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:29am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:31am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:34am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:35am
Posted: 3/10/07 at 10:40am
Remember the uk went through something similar , also it only touches on it in hairspray it doesn't go in to detail of what was happening at the time.
I have to disagree with the Fame been terrible comment to(but only because i was in it for years haha).Plus its now one of the longest running and most profitable shows in West End history.
Posted: 3/10/07 at 11:28am
Updated On: 3/10/07 at 11:28 AM
Posted: 3/10/07 at 12:01pm
Updated On: 3/10/07 at 12:01 PM
Posted: 3/10/07 at 12:25pm
I guess it depends on how good the movie is. When the Rent movie came out, attendance at the Broadway show went up phenomenally. I heard that people wanted to see the real thing because they were so disappointed with the film. There's also the live factor - people will definitely pay more for a fun night out seeing a show they're familiar with. You can see the film anytime you want, but how often can you see the real thing acted and sung onstage? Look at how many people are flocking to Dirty Dancing, when the film is on television every five minutes and free!
Posted: 3/10/07 at 12:31pm
Make up your own mind
Daddy Cool
High Society
The Far Pavillions
Bat Boy
Thouroughly Modern Millie
Calamity Jane
125th Street
Umoja
Peggy Sue Got Married
Napoleon
Lautrec
Rent
Tommy
I'm not a huge fan of Hairspray, but after Wicked made a mint over here there's no reason why this shouldnt be a hit, regardless of which theatre it lands in.
If Billy Elliot started at the Shaftesbury, would it have closed by now?
Posted: 3/10/07 at 6:53pm
Posted: 3/10/07 at 7:52pm
Posted: 3/10/07 at 8:16pm
It is entirely possible, and probable.
BroadwayWorld TV