I think an evaluation of her celebrity kinda depends on the arena in which it is being considered. Also, it's a question of the components that make up a "star", which I see as awareness, BO potential and/or artistic respect from the industry and from her audience.
In the Broadway world:
Awareness = star.
BO Potential = not yet a star. She's never opened a show on her name (a la Bernadette, Patti, etc). "Promises, Promises" should be interesting experiment, though obviously it's not the purest test since she has the benefit of (the even more recognizable) Sean Hayes' name alongside hers.
Respect = possibly a star. On the one hand, audiences generally adore her and go crazy for her. And I think the audiences and the industry alike acknowledge what a magnificent and special voice she has. But she's not really a proven actress by any means yet; not on par, for example, with Audra. So for some, the jury may still be out.
Final Verdict = almost a star. Already gets starring roles, but not a bona fide star yet except in the minds of her fans.
In the rest of the entertainment world:
Awareness = not a star. As has been said, many people vaguely recognize her name but still don't know who she is.
BO Potential = definitely not a star. Witness the fate of the shows where she has been a series regular.
Respect = borderline star. She's definitely earned some respect as a character actress and a gifted comedienne. "Pushing Daisies" was a big help in that department. But I think both the industry and the audience still see her as a bit of a one-trick pony. Or maybe a one-trick pony who can sing. The Dusty Springfield biopic that she is working on could go a long way to breaking her out of her "little funny blonde" pigeonhole.
Final verdict = star potential but needs to show more range.
"No matter how much you want the part, never let 'em see you sweat." -- Old Dry Idea commercial
Updated On: 1/16/10 at 02:06 PM