I'm watching South Pacific
Posted: 10/22/13 at 2:29am
Posted: 10/22/13 at 6:45am
Posted: 10/22/13 at 7:19am
Posted: 10/22/13 at 8:06am
The guy in front of him, shorter and with dark hair, "steals" most of the shots in the Seabees scenes.
Updated On: 10/22/13 at 08:06 AM
Posted: 10/24/13 at 12:19pm
Posted: 10/24/13 at 2:26pm
Same here. I love R and H Musicals but I never seemed to really get into SOUTH PACIFIC..Or for that matter, Carousel. They are still great shows, but I can't sink my teeth into those 2.
Posted: 10/24/13 at 10:04pm
Posted: 10/25/13 at 2:15am
Posted: 10/25/13 at 4:00am
broadwaybabywannabe2 - how do you shorten your name? lol. I am going to dig out my copy of Camelot and look for the bandage, lol.
Posted: 10/25/13 at 8:18pm
I love SOUTH PACIFIC with all its colorization problems...but in reality all R & H musicals do not work seemlessly on film...they were meant to be seen on stage...they can try to open them up some but eventually because of the nature of film-making back then they all look like they were filmed on sets...with some major exceptions of course...
Posted: 10/25/13 at 8:29pm
Posted: 10/25/13 at 8:35pm
Updated On: 10/25/13 at 08:35 PM
Posted: 10/25/13 at 9:44pm
And I find Emile a bore on stage.
Posted: 10/25/13 at 10:52pm
Updated On: 10/25/13 at 10:52 PM
Posted: 10/26/13 at 12:31am
Posted: 10/26/13 at 8:55am
Updated On: 10/26/13 at 08:55 AM
Posted: 10/26/13 at 10:41am
**SNARK**
Posted: 10/26/13 at 1:32pm
Posted: 10/26/13 at 2:56pm
Posted: 10/26/13 at 4:04pm
Posted: 10/26/13 at 5:10pm
I have Nellie and my children, so I won't risk my life.
I still have my children, but I don't have Nellie. I will risk my life.
The only the thing that made him change his mind is whether Nellie is with him or not.
Posted: 10/26/13 at 5:44pm
The TV version with Glenn Close was awful.
The Lincoln Center production was good, except for the replacement Cable, who was so incredibly bad my head is still spinning (see Linda Blair in The Exorcist). Other than that, it was the best production I've seen of it so far.
I will say that I was lucky enough to be cast in an excellent production of it in summer stock that starred the late, great David Holliday, who played opposite Katharine Hepburn in "Coco" and played Don Quixote in "Man of La Mancha" on Broadway. I have never seen a better Emile de Becque, and that includes everyone.
Maybe that's why I'm still waiting for a "perfect' production. Something to gather the best of what I've seen (and done) before.
I certainly think this show is worthy of it.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 10/26/13 at 5:56pm
I feel like South Pacific is just incredibly hard to do well in general though; all of the main and supporting roles could easily go sour if not cast correctly, and the director needs to be able to handle both the lighter musical moments and those unending war room scenes (which I found borderline unbearable in the revival, not because the actors were doing anything wrong but because they're just so long and not very interesting).
Posted: 10/26/13 at 6:03pm
I agree. There's something to love in all the R&H films, but they don't exactly "work". I think the problem is that Hammerstein's brilliance as a lyricist lies in his ability to evoke the physical setting. ("There's a bright, golden haze on the meadow...")
When you move the R&H works to location settings and film them in Cinemascope and Technicolor, it makes the lyrics mostly redundant.
The exception, IMO, is THE SOUND OF MUSIC, because--after the opening number--the stage play basically takes place indoors. So the gorgeous film of the Alps isn't redundant because the characters aren't also singing about the mountains; they are singing about lonely goatherds and girls turning 17.
BroadwayWorld TV
