muscle: i think what yankee (not trying to speak for you yankee, please correct me if i'm wrong) meant was that 'passing strange' lost because of the race card, which i personally don't argee with.
imho, 'passing strange' lost because it's just not commerical enough. 'ith' is still a pretty traditional musical in structure and design. you have to remember that a lot of tony voters are executives from venues throughout the country. many times they vote for shows that they know will sell in their venue. i loved both these shows, and i think that 'ith' deserves the recoginition it got, even though i think 'passing strange' is a better show, that does more to progress the form into new, exciting territory.
i'm sad you didn't like 'ith', but i'd love to hear you thoughts about 'passing strange' which will be on great performance tonight on pbs!! i recommend watching or dvr-ing it!!
"the stage too must experiment - with ideas, with the psychological relationship of men and women, with speech and rhythm forms, with dance and movement, with color and light - or it must and should become a museum product. in an age of terrific implications as to wealth and poverty, as to the function of government, as to peace and war, as to the relation of the artist to all these forces, the theatre must grow up. the theatre must become conscious of the implications of the changing social order, or the changing social older will ignore, and rightly, the implications of the theatre." - hallie flanagan, director of the federal theatre project
*blame e.e. mings*