Into The Woods- Witch played by a male??? — Page 2
Posted: 12/16/05 at 6:38am
Posted: 12/16/05 at 7:45am
There was a famous production in Philadelphia that was cast using the conventions of English Pantomime - all the "hag" roles are played by men in drag, and the "young boy" roles are played by girls. In this production, the Witch, Jack's Mother and Cinderella's Stepmother were played by men, and Jack was played by a girl.
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:17am
We're talkinga bout 2 different things here.
1) Casting a male to play the witch and maintaining the character as a female.
2) Casting a male to play the witch and changing the character to be male.
Without saying, Sondheim/Lapine have final say with the property as the authors of the piece and could easily pull a productions rights for changing gender of the character. Sondheim has been known for pulling rights and preventing productions where the gender of characters have been changed. (ie: 2 male production of "Marry Me a Little") Not too different from the Beckett estate preventing gender different productions of his works.
SIDE NOTE: It would be interesting to see a production cast a male as the witch and keeping the character female and having the rights pulled for casting- and seeing if a law suit followed because it would be simular to casting a person of a different race in a traditional white role ie- a non jew in Fiddler on the roof.
Personally, I think without a doubt, a male could play the witch. The director would have to justify the choice, whethere it be he was the best person for ther role or a conscious choice to cast a male to paint a picture or make a statent or to express an idea.
I think that if he put the male in full out drag- flat out it might come across as cheapening or distracting to the meaning of the show- but at the same time, if done with the right design support, could be quite effective.
The witch is- a very androgenous character to begin with. Mystical- not real. Witches obviously don't really exist so why should the play to our wordly or even cultured views on gender of what a witch is. In many societies, the mystical "witch" roles are often men who trangress their gender- both mentally and in some extremes physically through surgury. In many other cultures, transgendered individuals are considdered very magical and mysterious. Under these circumstances, a male could easily be cast a witch.
The hardest part of casting the part this way is obviously the transformation. Done correctly, the transformation would not have to be gendered in regards to dress- but could come across beautifully adrongenous.
That is all- now back to my tranny cave of an appartment. The wigs are taking over. And I think the hairspray fumes are getting to my brain.
Updated On: 12/16/05 at 08:17 AM
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:18am
Updated On: 12/16/05 at 08:18 AM
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:27am
All right maybe not that glamorous....
Widow Twanky
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:31am
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:39am
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:56am
Posted: 12/16/05 at 10:09am
and what about all the shows being done lately with completely female casts playing all the male roles? if you're going to get upset about a man taking away a "perfectly good female role", you'd better look at all the women taking away perfectly good male roles.
Posted: 12/16/05 at 10:27am
and what about all the shows being done lately with completely female casts playing all the male roles? if you're going to get upset about a man taking away a "perfectly good female role", you'd better look at all the women taking away perfectly good male roles. "
And all those Shakespearean roles originally written to be played by men and boys and that are now played by women...how dare they?
"In this production, the Witch, Jack's Mother and Cinderella's Stepmother were played by men, and Jack was played by a girl."
As a piece of theatre history (all right, trivia) - the role of Jack in the pantomime Jack and the Beanstalk (which was first performed 1773) marked the appearance of the first Principal Boy (i.e. an actress role)in a pantomime in 1819.
Jack and the Beanstalk
Updated On: 12/16/05 at 10:27 AM
Posted: 12/16/05 at 11:07am
Posted: 12/16/05 at 11:20am
the witch is not a male role nor written for a male. If the director is insisting upon casting it this way...they havent read the book or listened to the score closely. the witch as a man has completely different implications.
BOOM SPLAT
Posted: 12/16/05 at 11:58am
Posted: 12/16/05 at 2:51pm
Posted: 12/16/05 at 3:03pm
Posted: 12/16/05 at 3:17pm
Oh I don't know....Ethel did a fairly good impersonation
Posted: 12/16/05 at 3:37pm
Wouldn't it be funny if rapunzel were played by a boy?
Posted: 12/16/05 at 3:50pm
Posted: 12/16/05 at 4:51pm
Posted: 12/16/05 at 4:52pm
Posted: 12/16/05 at 6:09pm
please clarify your ..cryptic message.
Posted: 12/16/05 at 8:17pm
I just cannot fathom a male witch. Now, a man playing the witch (but playing it as a woman) would be ok, I suppose. However, changing the gender of the character would not work, IMO.
Posted: 12/17/05 at 6:35am
The Witch is a really great part and it would be very mean of him to audition for that part
Posted: 12/17/05 at 7:05am
Somestimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I remember some colour-blind casting of "The Miracle Worker" in DC a few years ago and it didn't work, so it isn't like everything can work, but I seriously think roles like The Witch, Mama Rose, Lady Bracknell would work because the characters have such a larger then life personality, in fact that is where gender-blind casting (gender blind in that the characers are still women, just played by male actors instead of female actors) would work best - with larger then life personality characters.
PS... Your avatar really draws my attention to it.
Updated On: 12/17/05 at 07:05 AM
BroadwayWorld TV