Good grief. I know exactly what you're trying to say. I don't even disagree with you that she's a fairytale princess. I've said so now twice (so much for reading comprehension.)
It's that the words you use to imply what you're attempting to say, specifically "Disney" (which is now a name brand and production Studio that has ownership rights over its own very well-known version of the story and once upon a time also referred to a specific individual who had nothing to do with the current CINDERELLA we're discussing), are poorly-chosen and incorrect.
And it's not just me who cares about things like this. Or the lawyers of the aggrieved parties, either. The production has gone to great pains to insist on being properly billed RODGERS + HAMMERSTEIN'S CINDERELLA for precisely this reason. Calling any aspect of this production "Disney" is mistaken.
And, of course, I'm aware "Disney princess" is a figure of speech. You know who else is aware? Disney. For the last decade or so they've been very actively trying to wrest back the name brand they rightfully oversee from the generic public misconceptions of non-Disney princesses. So, for both R&H's and Disney's sake, try not to impudently insist that your "opinion" (which isn't an opinion and is factually incorrect) is worth anything.
Remember, when people get flummoxed by someone's behavior on here, it's because we can only go by how we present ourselves. Do show some respect to the artists, if you care.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.
