Is the Company 2011 Philharmonic DVD still happening? — Page 3
Posted: 8/12/12 at 8:29pm
It's not an oddity. It's a weakness.
Posted: 8/12/12 at 9:11pm
It would, in fact, make a few moments in the show (both original and revised) make a bit more sense. The squeamish, nervous reaction of relatively young and hip inner-city New Yorkers to trying pot for the first time always rung false, but fortysomething Bobby and his older friends trying it hesitantly for the first time works in a better "generation gap" way.
Posted: 8/12/12 at 9:11pm
And as you also point out, nowadays, we think nothing of someone reaching 35 or even 40 without settling down.
The Doyle version is the one major incarnation I didn't see, so thank you for your account of it.
***
ETA I disagree about the pot. I found it entirely believable in the original. The 30-somethings in the play are the generation that came of age in the 1950s. That a middle-class married couple of their generation had never tried pot made perfect sense and jived with the claims, at least, of my parents and their friends. (Robert, of course, HAS tried it before and that makes sense because he dates younger, more bohemian types like Marta.)
By comparison, there were still plenty of liberal arts colleges in the 1950s that had strict dress codes and required weekly attendance at chapel. And those weren't just the religious schools!
I think that scene has to go if the play is set in the present day. I find it much harder to believe that a couple of people who were 17 in 1995 or even 1990 has never tried pot. And even if they haven't, they'd have a much different attitude about it.
Best to keep the play in its period. I agree with Eric on that.
But I've let my own thoughts wander from your point, darquegk. Yes, it might suit contemporary frames of reference to make Bobby 40, even if the period of the show stays the same.
Updated On: 8/12/12 at 09:11 PM
Posted: 8/12/12 at 9:21pm
Your hurry to be an asshole interferes with your reading comprehension skills. In the post you quote, I said the contradiction had always kept the show from fully succeeding for me until Neil Patrick Harris found a way to gap the divide.
Posted: 8/13/12 at 12:24am
It's a defect.
And Dean Jones was better than all of them.
P.S.
I think you mean bridge the divide..
Updated On: 8/13/12 at 12:24 AM
Posted: 8/13/12 at 5:12am
Yes, I did. Thank you.
Fortunately I got "asshole" right.
Posted: 8/13/12 at 7:19am
You sure did!
It's a long bridge to gap, anyway.
Posted: 8/13/12 at 12:24pm
Your comments about the generation portrayed in the play, also known as the "Silent Generation", those born between 1926 and 1946, make perfect sense. They were the earliest married and had the most children, as opposed to us "Baby Boomers" who married later and had the fewest children.
The pressure to conform was the primary theme of that generation, in keeping with the theme of "Company". They were overshadowed by the heroic "GI Generation" and were too old to enjoy much of the sexual freedom evidenced by the Boomers.
While I found your comments intelligent and enlightening, I found your referring to a board member as an asshole for expressing his opinion, childish and inappropriate.
Updated On: 8/13/12 at 12:24 PM
Posted: 8/13/12 at 9:23pm
But you are right that it was childish and inappropriate of me to take the bait.
I hope you'll believe me that I and others have run out of mature and appropriate responses to that poster on this and every subject. Obviously, silence is the only response left.
***
Back to being 35 (or 39) in 1970, my father fancied himself very much the playboy, but even so I doubt he tried marijuana until he started dating a woman who was my age. Alcohol was the drug of choice for that generation (as we see in more than one scene of COMPANY). It was obvious in the way they talked about pot that they had never tried it.
Posted: 8/13/12 at 9:32pm
I actually can't remember if the Harris version reverted to the original script in those instances or not. I do find it interesting that fans go on and on about all the changes in the script to Follies, but many don't seem to realize just how much of Company was re-written for the revised version.
Posted: 8/13/12 at 9:35pm
I was expressing an opinion.
"In this case, I'd actually described what I see as a fault in the show, but apparently I didn't voice it strongly enough to suit After Eight. "
You didn't express it properly.
Posted: 8/13/12 at 9:40pm
Posted: 8/13/12 at 9:42pm
I don't know why quantities of alcohol were changed in the 90s script, but I wonder if Firth thought that the amounts in the original made the characters seem like raging alcoholics two decades later. Maybe he decided we would ignore the characters' other qualities once we deemed them "drunks".
Before the laws on drinking and driving became so much stricter, I knew a lot of people who drank like Joanne. They basically "sipped" all afternoon and evening without ever considering themselves "drunk". We'd probably call them alcoholics today.
Updated On: 8/13/12 at 09:42 PM
Posted: 8/13/12 at 10:25pm
In the long run, I am much happier responding to everyone in a civil fashion.
Updated On: 8/13/12 at 10:25 PM
Posted: 8/13/12 at 10:27pm
For anyone curious, there's a great overview of all the changes made to Company in the 90s here: http://www.sondheim.com/commentary/company_rewritten_1.html
(I got the amount of bottles wrong--it was merely 5 in the original, then changed to 3)
Posted: 8/13/12 at 10:49pm
Posted: 8/13/12 at 10:55pm
***
Well put, darque, as usual.
Updated On: 8/13/12 at 10:55 PM
Posted: 8/13/12 at 11:06pm
Posted: 8/13/12 at 11:15pm
Posted: 8/13/12 at 11:17pm
Posted: 8/13/12 at 11:22pm
Posted: 8/13/12 at 11:23pm
Joanne, on the other hand, is an aggressive, drunken monster who threatens violence and shouts down everyone who vaguely annoys with her. No real wit to it, no sense of irony. Just genuine antisocial personality disorder. Is it more "real?" Maybe. Is it true to 1971? Possibly. But it simply begs the question- maybe a question that wasn't asked in that era- why is this woman Bobby's most intimate friendship? She's a bitch! And not a bitch in the post-feminist, semi-ironic sense of a woman who speaks her mind and has an aggressive and assertive attitude. No, Old Joanne is a bitch in the bitchiest bitch sense. For better or for worse, she's become a snarky society lady (and apparently, like Bobby, grown somewhat younger over the years).
Posted: 8/14/12 at 12:01am
And this is extremely anal of me, but I can't stop myself... It was 1970, not '71.
BroadwayWorld TV