#26
Posted: 3/13/05 at 8:57pm
it's not rediculous. it's just another reason to add to the list of why seeing RENT live is better than the movie...
It is ridiculous that this upsets me? — Page 2
#27
Posted: 3/13/05 at 8:59pm
well I agree that you can't beat seeing it live but I really am holding high hopes for the movie. It sounds like they are doing a great job with it so far.
I wanted to get something that an "ex"-junkie like him would really appreciate and cherish....it's a brick of heroin shaped like a heart.
-Scrubs
#28
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:04pm
in the end though, if you're THAT attached to the costumes you haven't seen the worst of it. just wait till regional companies get their hands on it...
#29
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:05pm
understandble. I'm upset too!!!
btw~ whiteboy spice, i see you're online right now. I love the pictures of you from the set! :)
btw~ whiteboy spice, i see you're online right now. I love the pictures of you from the set! :)
awkward.
"I think it was the Korean tour or something. They were all frickin' asian!" -Zoran912
#30
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:06pm
Yeah, once the movies come up most of the costumes will become national best sellers at most clothing outlets. :-P Again, get ready for the apocolypse of RENT-heads my friends...
I wanted to get something that an "ex"-junkie like him would really appreciate and cherish....it's a brick of heroin shaped like a heart.
-Scrubs
#31
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:47pm
This really doesn't bother me.
This reminds me of Lord of the Rings. For the 1st and 2nd movies strayed so far from the books and my one friend who is a HUGE LotR fan accepted them. Then the 3rd movie came out and she was complaining about some many little things, yet it was the one movie that kept closest to the book.
I think because the movie will follow so close to the story, people will be more critical about the details. Where as the Chbosky screen play strayed from the musical very much yet people love it. The more the plot strays from the original source, the more accepting we will be of the minor things.
I think we all need to worry about the plot, the score, and the sets before the costumes! It seems like Chris Columbus is taking Rent's originality and sincerity seriously. While they hold a special place in my heart, I know that if they don't make it to film there are reasons why.
This reminds me of Lord of the Rings. For the 1st and 2nd movies strayed so far from the books and my one friend who is a HUGE LotR fan accepted them. Then the 3rd movie came out and she was complaining about some many little things, yet it was the one movie that kept closest to the book.
I think because the movie will follow so close to the story, people will be more critical about the details. Where as the Chbosky screen play strayed from the musical very much yet people love it. The more the plot strays from the original source, the more accepting we will be of the minor things.
I think we all need to worry about the plot, the score, and the sets before the costumes! It seems like Chris Columbus is taking Rent's originality and sincerity seriously. While they hold a special place in my heart, I know that if they don't make it to film there are reasons why.
I want to write music. I want to sit down right now at my piano and write a song that people will listen to and remember and do the same thing every morning...for the rest of my life. - Jonathan Larson. Tick, Tick...BOOM!
Updated On: 3/13/05 at 09:47 PM
#32
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:53pm
*one hour and half a bag of jellybeans later*
I suppose I worry it's a sign of bad things to come. Overreacting? Probably. The pants just seem to fit the character in my opinion- Roger didn't strike me as the subdued-clothing type.
*chews nails and awaits the next bombshell*
I suppose I worry it's a sign of bad things to come. Overreacting? Probably. The pants just seem to fit the character in my opinion- Roger didn't strike me as the subdued-clothing type.
*chews nails and awaits the next bombshell*
#33
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:55pm
No plaid pants.... this is a problem. But at least Adam's in the movie... looking hotter than ever. Sexier I should say. You should go see it for the sheer fact that Adam will be on the big screen (as well as Anthony), singing all our fav songs and stuff.
"He says... he wants to be obsessed with art, like me. He says... he wants to redevelop the creative side of his brain." - Mark NYTW RENT
#34
Posted: 3/13/05 at 9:56pm
While theatre uses costumes to make statements about personality, movies don't need to rely on that as much. While it is a part of Rent and its history, I have faith that Roger's personality will shine through in other places.
I want to write music. I want to sit down right now at my piano and write a song that people will listen to and remember and do the same thing every morning...for the rest of my life. - Jonathan Larson. Tick, Tick...BOOM!
Updated On: 3/13/05 at 09:56 PM
#35
Posted: 3/13/05 at 11:00pm
I love the plaid pants. It upsets me too.
"He who falls in love with himself will have no rivals"
-Benjamin Franklin
#36
Posted: 3/13/05 at 11:01pm
I love the plaid pants. It upsets me too.
"He who falls in love with himself will have no rivals"
-Benjamin Franklin
#37
Posted: 3/13/05 at 11:08pm
I tell you this -- if they're breaking from the Chbosky screenplay, hopefully that means that Contact or a similarly dark moment replaces the sentimental exchange between Angel and Collins in the hospital room! Musicalized sex is what I've come to associate with Rent.
#38
Posted: 3/14/05 at 7:40am
I really couldn't care less if Roger is wearing the plaid pants or not. If 'plaid pants' is what Rent is all about and can effect our opinion on the movie then there's something wrong.
I understand that it might be Roger's trademark to some people but let's remain real here, people. A movie is not a live show, costumes etc have to be changed as some might just not look right on the big screen. And as someone else here said if I'd had a choice between Justin Timberlake in plaid pants or Adam Pascal in different pants I think we would have all ditched the plaid pants immediately.
Let's be happy and positive about Christopher Columbus obviously attempting to stay true to Rent. The constant 'oh no, what has he done now?' must be very frustrating for everyone (cast etc) involved.
Guys, let's be happy that this great musical and Jonathan's work gets this great opportunity and not cry about some pants.
QM
I understand that it might be Roger's trademark to some people but let's remain real here, people. A movie is not a live show, costumes etc have to be changed as some might just not look right on the big screen. And as someone else here said if I'd had a choice between Justin Timberlake in plaid pants or Adam Pascal in different pants I think we would have all ditched the plaid pants immediately.
Let's be happy and positive about Christopher Columbus obviously attempting to stay true to Rent. The constant 'oh no, what has he done now?' must be very frustrating for everyone (cast etc) involved.
Guys, let's be happy that this great musical and Jonathan's work gets this great opportunity and not cry about some pants.
QM
'He really wasn't good as Fieyro. Is it just me or does he sort of come across as a pimp? Just...the hand motions I've seen him do and the attitude..not that Taye is a pimp.' - SallyBrown on Taye Diggs as Fiyero
#39
Posted: 3/14/05 at 8:57am
for those of us with a serious attachment to the show, it's hard to see elements like that changed. in my own head, the plaid pants belong there and it's just one of those elements that a) makes me happy to know i can drop by the nederlander and see RENT live anytime and b) a little apprehensive about the movie (but still excited about it).
#40
Posted: 3/14/05 at 8:57am
And as someone else here said if I'd had a choice between Justin Timberlake in plaid pants or Adam Pascal in different pants I think we would have all ditched the plaid pants immediately.
Tsk. Such disrespect for Justin Timberlake, QM.
I agree, actually. I understand the attachment to some of the iconic stuff, but you can't base your judgments about the potential merits of the movie based on that. They have a great cast. It certainly *sounds* like things are going well. Other than that, we'll just have to see when the movie comes out.
I love the show. I've loved it since I saw it in '96. But no, I'm not going to be upset over some pieces of clothing being changed.
Tsk. Such disrespect for Justin Timberlake, QM.
I agree, actually. I understand the attachment to some of the iconic stuff, but you can't base your judgments about the potential merits of the movie based on that. They have a great cast. It certainly *sounds* like things are going well. Other than that, we'll just have to see when the movie comes out.
I love the show. I've loved it since I saw it in '96. But no, I'm not going to be upset over some pieces of clothing being changed.
Updated On: 3/14/05 at 08:57 AM
#41
Posted: 3/14/05 at 9:18am
Well remember the movie musicals of the Golden Age. I can think of a few films that surpass their original stage incarnations.
It is highly possible RENT will do the same...
Though I doubt it
It is highly possible RENT will do the same...
Though I doubt it
#42
Posted: 3/14/05 at 10:37am
is the movie going to be a musical? sorry i was just wondering....*is embarassed for not knowing
How can they see with sequins in their eyes?
#43
Posted: 3/14/05 at 11:23am
I completely forgot he wore plaid pants until I read this and I've seen the show many times. It's not a big deal. They do not define his character nor affect the story in any way. I never thought of them as Roger's "trademark" at all.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
.jpg?format=auto&width=300)
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $65
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $71