"I also have to question whether they would feel so vehemently against the direction at the end of the show if it had been a different director who was not seen as having a such a huge personal vendetta against Robbins."
Not at all. I've only come to dislike Arthur and his vendetta through the changes he's made to the show, not vice-versa.
The whole should-every-aspect-of-the-show-stay-the-same debate...my opinion is something can be changed if it can be improved upon. The problem is there's not much in Robbins' original choreography (and especially in Bernstein's score for the record) that can be improved. Every decision made in this production that was different from the original has diminished the show.
But then again...I'll use the score as my example, as that is what I'm more familiar with...the entire score of WSS is so connected...through its use of musical elements and certain keys that were chosen...the way the musical elements come into the songs (for example: one of the elements is major and minor triads...think of the opening to the jet song...becomes the melody of "A Boy Like That" - "broth-er" and "oth-er.")...the score is so complete and connected, like a detailed story, that if you changed even one thing, it could take away from the connections and cohesiveness of the whole. Perhaps the same is true of the original direction -- one minor change can damage the chain.
"If there was a Mount Rushmore for Broadway scores, "West Side Story" would be front and center. It snaps, it crackles it pops! It surges with a roar, its energy and sheer life undiminished by the years" - NYPost reviewer Elisabeth Vincentelli
Updated On: 9/2/09 at 11:06 AM