I'll be a bigger naysayer: She didn't have the acting range for Rose. Forget the singing. She really wasn't versatile. Her two musical Tonys were for roles created around her persona. I'm in the minority, I thought "Woman of the Year" was a far more accomplished musical comedy performance (mainly because the "Applause" score is so mediocre.) But she could be terribly arch. I thought she was fine in "The Fan," playing ... Bacall. The role really was Bacall. (Though she's kind of awful in the big denouement, when the writing really fails, so does she.) Rose demands a kind of core energy, and a considerable emotional range. Take one of the set pieces, the brilliant monologue Laurents wrote wherein Rose preps Gypsy for her first strip. It's a great actor's great scene, no music but underscoring. I can see Bacall flattening it, without the urgency. I write this having seen her give one of the most two-dimensional performances I've ever seen, in "Sweet Bird of Youth," in London. She was suprisingly uninteresting. It's a character she clearly should've nailed. Not a stretch in any way except in requiring a level of vulnerability -- of truly revealing, even exposing herself -- to another actor on stage. That's what Williams requires. She couldn't do it, and she gave what I called a "radio" performance. Intelligent sounding but devoid of a whiff of life's real pain. She didn't pull up her darkness. She indicated it. Margo and Tess didn't require Rose's darkness. And then when we add the music...
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 9/22/14 at 05:50 PM